So Called Experts Agree: Abortion Not Mentioned In The Bible, So It's OK

In a #TimeMagazine piece, #KathaPollitt, author of "Reclaiming Abortion Rights," not unlike Justin Ling's piece on Wired titled "Elon Musk's Twitter Files Are a Feast For Conspiracy Theorists,"



Even though Andrew Lowenthal says that “The #TwitterFiles show how “anti-disinformation” academics and NGOs undermined free speech and expression,” and Musk says the NYTimes’ ‘propaganda isn’t even interesting’ and their Twitter feed is the ‘equivalent of diarrhea,'

Or CNN reported today that it's experts have determined #diversity marketing campaigns like #BudLight can be lucrative, even though Anheuser-Busch lost $6billion in six day


Or New York Times' Experts discovering that prayer can be hazardous to your health.


Not to mention Pfizer's Dr Becci Corkill's paper saying that because of the Doubling of the Knowledge Curve, there's nothing to worry about the COVID Vaccine.

And who can forget the Climate Change Scientists using flawed data and models? A just released Big Data study reveals flaws in a common analytical method within population genetics. The flawed method has been used in hundreds of thousands of studies, influencing findings in medical genetics and even commercial ancestry tests. The findings were recently published in the Journal Scientific Reports


After we found out that climate models are clouded by scientific biases

Anyway, Pollit argues for abortion because, according to Pollit"It shouldn’t matter what the Bible says about abortion. The United States is not a theocracy. Still, given the certitude of abortion opponents that abortion violates God’s Word, it might come as a surprise that neither the Old Testament nor the New mentions abortion—not one word."

But of course, the biggest visionary the world has ever known, King Solomon said, there's nothing new under the sun:

All things are wearisome,

too wearisome for words.

The eye is not satisfied by seeing

nor has the ear enough of hearing.

What has been, that will be; what has been done, that will be done. Nothing is new under the sun (Ecclesiastes Chapter 1)

For thousands of years, the illuminati have been trying to outsmart God. In Corinthians 1 Chapter 1, Saint Paul writes: " For it is written:

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,

and the learning of the learned I will set aside.”l


Where is the wise one? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made the wisdom of the world foolish?

For since in the wisdom of God the world did not come to know God through wisdom, it was the will of God through the foolishness of the proclamation to save those who have faith." - 1 Corinth 1


Then, there's a simple nun in Blessed Anne Catherine Emmeruch - " Under the appearance of a simple nun, Anne Catherine Emmerich (Coesfeld, 1774 – Dullmen, 1824) hides one of the great catholic mistycs of the last centuries. Since her earliest childhood, she was a soul of exceptional kindness, devotion and purity. Her life and her legacy will enlighten for centuries Christianity and all mankind. French writer Léon Bloy said: “If the book “Life of Anne Catherine Emmerich”, written by Father Schmoeger, was read by twenty people in each diocese, God would change the face of the world





Pollit's and the pro-infanticide lobby continue to use tired arguments similar to the one used about the Separation of Church and State or the 2A.

Reminds us of the old adage: True freedom is not to do what we want, when we want, or do what we are allowed to do or told to do. But what we ought to do.

Scriptures do address abortion, and it's et in stone: Though shall not kill - Exodus Chapter 20

Then there's the New Commandment described in Matthew

“You have heard that it was said to your ancestors, ‘You shall not kill; and whoever kills will be liable to judgment.’

But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment,o and whoever says to his brother, ‘Raqa,’ will be answerable to the Sanhedrin, and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ will be liable to fiery Gehenna." Matt Chapter 5

Consider John the Baptist, respected by the established political and religious authorities - the same people who wanted to kill Jesus,
and also respected by Jesus' followers alike:

"John is "Elijah [who] must come." The fire of the Spirit dwells in him and makes him the forerunner of the coming Lord. In John, the precursor, the Holy Spirit completes the work of "[making] ready a people prepared for the Lord."" CCC 718


"There was a man sent from God, whose name was John." John was "filled with the Holy Spirit even from his mother's womb" by Christ himself, whom the Virgin Mary had just conceived by the Holy Spirit. Mary's visitation to Elizabeth thus became a visit from God to his people." CCC 717

Within days of Conception and still in the womb, John was filled with the Holy Spirit by Christ himself.


"John the Baptist is "more than a prophet." In him, the Holy Spirit concludes his speaking through the prophets. John completes the cycle of prophets begun by Elijah. He proclaims the imminence of the consolation of Israel; he is the "voice" of the Consoler who is coming. As the Spirit of truth will also do, John "came to bear witness to the light." In John's sight, the Spirit thus brings to completion the careful search of the prophets and fulfills the longing of the angels. "He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, this is he who baptizes with the Holy Spirit. And I have seen and have borne witness that this is the Son of God. . . . Behold, the Lamb of God."" CCC 719

Finally, with John the Baptist, the Holy Spirit begins the restoration to man of "the divine likeness," prefiguring what he would achieve with and in Christ. John's baptism was for repentance; baptism in water and the Spirit will be a new birth. CCC 720


What is very clear is that if the Hebrew Planned Parenthood had been around, both Elizabeth and the Virgin Mary would have been targeted for abortion. After all, Elizabeth was too old to care for Paul, and Jesus birth is considered a conspiracy theory by "modern scholarly consensus -< not unlike the aforementioned ones,> in that it rests on very slender historical foundations "

My own additions < >