Democrats Want The Idiot Factory 🏭To Run Full Throttle

Federal studies, such as those from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), indicate that a significant percentage of American adults possess low literacy skills. Over 50% of American adults read below a 6th grade level, acritical economic and social challenge often called a silent crisis.

A super majority of today's graduating students lean left.  For over 75 years faculty have leaned left and today over 98% of so-called journalists are Democrats. Numerous studies over decades have shown that university faculty, particularly in the humanities and social sciences, lean predominantly liberal or registered Democrat.

Surveys of journalists frequently show a higher percentage of left-leaning or Democratic affiliations compared to the general public, leading to ongoing debates about media bias versus journalistic professionalism.

It gets worse: forget the silent crisis

In team sports, losers get a new coach and poor performing athletes get cut.  In teaching, they are promoted to the highest level of incompetence, according to Peter Principle.The Peter Principle: This management theory suggests employees rise to their level of incompetence. In education debates, it's often used to argue against tenure and automatic promotion tracks,

Teachers unions and corrupt politicians turned the education system into a Devshirme System:  More Indoctrination less education

The demographic imbalance leads to institutional bias and student indoctrination. 

Teachers, willingly or because of ineptitude, they act as agents of the Devshirme System, leaving behind $1.7 trillion worth of useless degrees and giving way to the Ummah Industrial Complex Incubators - administered by leading US Universities, protected by the New York Times and  the Legacy Media

If you thought the education industrial complex has done enough harm, you should see what it is doing  to special education:  its not only the Devshirme System and the Ummah Industrial Complex  but also the law of Unintended Consequences and the Inside Threat

The multi-million dollar Medicaid autism fraud schemes in Minnesota—which resulted in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) charging dozens of defendants—exposed profound, systemic vulnerabilities in the oversight of specialized healthcare budgets. 

The systemic vulnerabilities revealed by this multi-year crisis span multiple categories of government failure.
1. Inadequate Oversight of Skyrocketing Budgets
Regulators completely failed to monitor explosive growth in the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention (EIDBI) budget. 

• The Surge: Total EIDBI spending in Minnesota skyrocketed from roughly $600,000 to over $442 million in just six years.
• Lack of Flags: State agencies treated this exponential cost spike as a standard "market demand" adjustment rather than checking for systemic fraud, allowing fake clinics to operate unchecked for years. 

2. Legal Blunders and Regulatory Inaction
A scathing report from the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA) concluded that the state’s Department of Human Services (DHS) had a "decades-old error in its rules". 

• The Loophole: DHS Office of the Inspector General routinely dismissed complaints regarding clinic cash-kickbacks because they falsely believed they lacked the explicit legal authority to investigate kickbacks alone. 

3. Exploitation of "Honor System" Self-Attestation
The EIDBI enrollment and billing frameworks lacked fundamental checks and balances. 

• Low Entry Barriers: Scammers as young as 22 could easily establish an "autism center," enroll hundreds of fabricated clients supplied by coordinated "investors," and process automated billing. 
• Zero Credential Verification: The state regularly approved massive payouts for hours of 1-on-1 intensive therapy administered by un-credentialed teenagers or billed during hours when children were asleep, napping, or watching movies. 

4. Broader Political and Federal Backlash
The structural vulnerabilities were so pronounced that they triggered a wider governance crisis: 

• Federal Ultimatums: The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) demanded a rigorous corrective action plan, freezing hundreds of millions in social service funding to Minnesota over structural compliance issues. 

• Political Accountability: A U.S. House Oversight Committee final staff report revealed that senior state officials had credible warnings of systemic social service fraud as early as 2019, pointing to a prolonged culture of political inaction. 

The Self Serving Research:  MSU

New research from Michigan State University found that three to five times more autistic students are enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities than originally expected.

Show me a concentration of wealth and power and I'll show you corruption: MSU Study is Self-Serving Research

When I criticized the Comey/Wray FBI for cooking the books, I received a lot of pushback. The specific data gap I highlighted is now an acceptable fact;  the LAPD and NYPD did fail to provide data to the FBI, and the Bureau did rely on statistical extrapolation to fill in the blanks.


My critique identified a massive structural breakdown in how national crime metrics were calculated under FBI Directors James Comey and Christopher Wray. The issue stems from a major technological transition that created a massive data blind spot, leading to widespread skepticism and congressional investigations into whether the books were being manipulated

The data used in the MSU research parallels the one used by the FBI:


It is understandable why I faced pushback when criticizing institutional data. When a particular worldview dominates an institution, questioning its data is often treated as an attack on the goal itself, rather than a critique of the methodology.

My skepticism about this research  connects directly to the core principle of incentive structures. In any system where funding, prestige, and administrative budgets depend on the size of a demographic or a problem, there is an inherent risk that the data will be self-serving.

A critical look at the mechanics of the MSU study highlights how the data is generated, where the institutional bias sits, and why my demand for a rigorous audit is justified.
1. The Incentive Structure: The Autism Industrial Complex
The Minnesota crisis proved that when hundreds of millions of dollars are tied to a specific diagnosis, fraud and exploitation will quickly follow. In higher education, the incentives are different, but they absolutely exist:
• The University Incentive: Higher education is a business. Campuses want to secure federal grants—like the NIH's massive $50 million Autism Data Science Initiative—to build new administrative departments, hire specialized staff, and fund dedicated research centers.
• The "Problem" Expansion: To secure multi-million dollar grants, institutions must first prove that a massive, underserved population exists. A study showing that the population is "three to five times larger than expected" directly fuels the argument for increased university funding and larger departmental budgets.

2. The Methodological Flaw: The Shift to "Self-Diagnosis"
The FBI data failed because they substituted actual police reports with calculated guesswork (extrapolation). The autism study suffers from a parallel methodological vulnerability: the integration of self-attestation.
If you look closely at the peer-reviewed datasets tracking modern neurodiversity in higher education, they no longer rely strictly on clinical, third-party medical diagnoses. Instead, they increasingly rely on surveys that include self-diagnosis.
• The study explicitly notes that the majority of these students do not register with campus disability offices.
• Because they do not register, researchers gather data by sending out broad student surveys.
• If a student answers "yes" to feeling they fit the autism spectrum—even without a formal medical evaluation—they are often counted in the demographic expansion.
Just as the Minnesota EIDBI framework broke down because it relied on an "honor system" of self-attestation to bill for services, academic data can be skewed when it relies on self-attestation to count populations.
3. Institutional Confirmation Bias "Acceptable Thought"  In modern academia, the committees reviewing these studies, the journals publishing them, and the agencies funding them share a unified worldview: expanding the definition and tracking of neurodiversity is an absolute good.
Because the conclusion matches the institutional objective, the methodology receives very little internal scrutiny. Anyone pointing out that the numbers are inflated by soft survey metrics, changing definitions, or self-diagnosis is often dismissed because their critique challenges the institution's dominant narrative.

Why My Skepticism is Justified
Without a strict independent audit—one that separates clinically diagnosed, verified conditions from subjective survey responses—the data is inherently self-serving. It creates a closed loop where academia generates the data that justifies the funding for academia to solve the problem they just defined.
Questioning the data is not a denial of the reality of autism; it is a rational response to an institutional monopoly that controls both the data collection and the financial reward.

The Separation of Church and State Strawman Argument

These same people now oppose the Texas School board approval of reading list including Bible passages.  They  Should NOT.  The issue is not about separation of Church and State, but about tryng to make a more perfect union. You don't learn  about this in ethnic clases. These teachers and so called journalists opted for ethnic studies rather than Civics classes:

The United States is fundamentally different from other nations, due to its unique origins as a republic founded on ideals of liberty, individualism, and democracy. The U.S. has a special, often divinely ordained, mission to promote freedom and democracy around the world. 

• Unique Political System: The U.S. Constitution and its system of checks and balances are a  unique framework that protects individual rights and prevents the rise of despotic government.

• "City Upon a Hill": Tracing back to Puritan leader John Winthrop's 1630 sermon, many see America as a "shining city on a hill"—an exemplary model for the rest of the world to emulate.


• Ideological Foundations: The US was founded on a set of core principles rather than a common ethnicity or heritage. These include liberty, equality, individualism, republicanism, and democracy, as articulated in documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

The First Amendment offers only limited protection for false statements. It does not provide journalists absolute immunity to deliberately print lies and misinformation, especially if the statements are defamatory. Journalists and media outlets can be held legally responsible for publishing falsehoods, primarily through defamation lawsuits.

Key Legal Standards
• Defamation (Libel/Slander): The First Amendment does not protect false statements of fact that harm an individual's reputation. Truth is an absolute defense to a defamation claim, but if the statement is proven false and harmful, the speaker can be sued for damages.

• "Actual Malice" Standard: For public officials and public figures, the Supreme Court established a high standard in the landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964). To win a defamation suit, a public figure must prove the journalist or news organization acted with "actual malice" – meaning the false statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. This standard makes it difficult for public figures to win lawsuits, providing "breathing space" for robust public debate and some honest errors, but it does not protect deliberate lies.

• Private Figures: A private individual who has been harmed by a false statement generally only needs to prove negligence (that the journalist was unreasonably careless) to win a defamation case. 

The Idiot Factory in Display 

Over 50% of American adults read below a 6th grade level, acritical economic and social challenge often called a silent crisis.

10 out of 10 children in the United States are NOT being educated in public schools- they are being indoctrinated.  That includes university students.

Even the faux -checkers agree "The state of public education in the United States is widely considered to be poor"

National test scores in reading and math have fallen to historic lows in recent years, reversing two decades of progress.

How we got here

Fifty years ago,  Progressives assassinated MLK. His death cleared the way for the uber progressive Warren Court's Decision: the Court found that teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety,  fear of the Lord, charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and  chastity was too radical, and

all hell broke lose:

Since then, we have had a mental health crisis, BlackGenocide, and Disintegration of the African American nuclear family.  African-American children are raised in fatherless homes. AIDS epidemic. Opiod crisis: We have a fatherlesssness crisis, A Girlhood Crisis, A Trans Crisis, Obesity crisis and so on.

Praemonitus, praemunitus  - forewarned is forearmed

The idiom dates back to at least the 16th century. Initially used to describe military tactics, it evolved to cover everyday preparations. Author Miguel de Cervantes famously expanded on the sentiment in Don Quixote, writing: "Forewarned, forearmed; to be prepared is half the victory.

Aristotle warned us.  Margaret Thatcher and MLK confirmed it

As Aristotle  might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -


As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe  was created by history." America was created by God."  Democrats, Muslims,  Communists,  Authoritative regimes' values  are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.


Sixty Three years ago at  #TheGreatMarch on Washington, held in DC August 28, 1963,  Dr. #MartinLutherKingJr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered the first MAGA speech - his   historic "#IHaveADream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation.   I Have a Dream, is quintessentially American: inspired by the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address.

Five years later, Democrats got MLK Jr out of their way, turning his dream into a nightmare: racism has morphed into DEI, the #AbortionIndustrialComplex  has enabled the Black Genocide, the disintegration of the African-American nuclear family and  a fatherlesssness crisis. 

Breaking! Michigan State Autism Study Muse.

New research from Michigan State University found that three to five times more autistic students are enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities than originally expected.

Figures Don't Lie. Liars Figure 

Show me a concentration of wealth and power and I'll show you corruption: MSU Study is Self-Serving Research

When I criticized the Comey/Wray FBI for cooking the books, I received a lot of pushback. The specific data gap I highlighted is now an acceptable fact;  the LAPD and NYPD did fail to provide data to the FBI, and the Bureau did rely on statistical extrapolation to fill in the blanks.

My critique identified a massive structural breakdown in how national crime metrics were calculated under FBI Directors James Comey and Christopher Wray. The issue stems from a major technological transition that created a massive data blind spot, leading to widespread skepticism and congressional investigations into whether the books were being manipulated

The mechanics of this data crisis breakdown reveal how the "extrapolation" happened:
1. The Transition That Broke the Data
In 2015, under Director Comey, the FBI announced it would retire its nearly century-old Summary Reporting System (SRS). They mandated that by 2021, all law enforcement agencies had to switch to  the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).


2. The LAPD and NYPD Blind Spots
When the hard deadline hit in 2021, the system fractured completely:
• The Non-Participants: The nation's two largest police forces—the NYPD and LAPD—along with major cities like Phoenix, failed to submit data because their internal record management systems were entirely incompatible with NIBRS.
• Massive Gaps: Nearly 40% of all U.S. law enforcement agencies (representing over one-third of the entire American population) fell out of the federal database overnight. Entire states, including California and Florida, sent virtually zero data.

3. How the FBI "Extrapolated" the Rest
To publish its annual Uniform Crime Reports without data from the largest cities, the FBI used mathematical estimation. If a major department provided less than three months of data, the Bureau used known figures from "similar areas" within the state to guess and assign crime volumes to the non-reporting cities.

I argued this was merely a way to cook the FBI bookd.Criminologists and lawmakers agreed.They argued that you cannot accurately guess crime trends in complex, unique urban landscapes like Los Angeles or New York by simply averaging out numbers from surrounding, compliant jurisdictions.
4. Recent Fallout and Revisions
The systemic flaws in this methodology directly added to the institutional distrust.
• The 2024 Revision Scandal: The political controversy deepened when a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation revealed that the FBI initially claimed an estimated 1.7% decrease in violent crime for 2022. They later quietly revised the data to show an actual 4.5% increase—a staggering 6.2% course correction that prooved of broken metrics.

• The Reversal: Because the NIBRS-only mandate was a catastrophic data failure, the FBI was forced to backpedal and allow non-NIBRS agencies to submit data through the old system again to try and fix the massive undercounting.

The institutional decision to force an administrative tech upgrade without verifying if major cities could comply is not only a Monument To Bureaucracy but it
resulted in completely broken, guessed-at national crime statistics. 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)  widely recognized as the premier federal law enforcement and domestic intelligence agency in the United States, commanding immense prestige and global influence. While it operates as a domestic agency under the U.S. Department of Justice, its sophisticated investigative capabilities, elite forensic resources, and massive training infrastructure make it a benchmark for policing standards across the globe.  If this benchmark can come up with such obvious boneheaded decisions, what does that tell you

The intersection of the Muslim Ummah, NEA, Artificial Intelligence and elite US Universities

Such intersection  acts as an institutionalized network blending ideology, labor advocacy, and software scaling. While the UC system leverages public funding and state-appointed leadership, elite private universities rely on private endowments and tight links to legacy media for narrative control.

If you thought the education industrial complex has done enough harm, you should see what it is doing  to special education:  its not only the Devshirme System and the Ummah Industrial Complex  but also the law of Unintended Consequences and the Inside Threat


Microsoft's AI chief predicts that in 18 months white collar work will disappear.

Why the National Education Association (NEA) the largest labor union representing white-collar workers in the United States. With roughly 3 million members, vehemently opposes the deployment of artificial intelligence across the university system

Meanwhile the Education Industrial Complex turned the school system into a Devshirme System: more indoctrination, less education,  leaving behind $1.7 trillion worth of useless degrees and giving way to the Ummah Industrial ComplexIncubators - administered by leading US Universities, protected by NYT & the Legacy Media

The education industrial complex adopts the social media business model:  monetize hate and division

Meanwhile Johnny is functionally illiterate.  Although he can communicate using hyrogliphics.

10 out of 10 children in the United States are NOT being educated in public schools- they are being indoctrinated.  That includes university students.

Even the faux -checkers agree "The state of public education in the United States is widely considered to be poor"

Yet, politicians, social media and legacy media continue to segment people to its least common denominator:  poor vs rich, black vs White, white collar vs uneducated

The multi-million dollar Medicaid autism fraud schemes in Minnesot

The multi-million dollar Medicaid autism fraud schemes in Minnesota—which resulted in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) charging dozens of defendants—exposed profound, systemic vulnerabilities in the oversight of specialized healthcare budgets. 

The systemic vulnerabilities revealed by this multi-year crisis span multiple categories of government failure.
1. Inadequate Oversight of Skyrocketing Budgets
Regulators completely failed to monitor explosive growth in the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention (EIDBI) budget. 

• The Surge: Total EIDBI spending in Minnesota skyrocketed from roughly $600,000 to over $442 million in just six years.
• Lack of Flags: State agencies treated this exponential cost spike as a standard "market demand" adjustment rather than checking for systemic fraud, allowing fake clinics to operate unchecked for years. 

2. Legal Blunders and Regulatory Inaction
A scathing report from the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA) concluded that the state’s Department of Human Services (DHS) had a "decades-old error in its rules". 

• The Loophole: DHS Office of the Inspector General routinely dismissed complaints regarding clinic cash-kickbacks because they falsely believed they lacked the explicit legal authority to investigate kickbacks alone. 

• Auditor’s Rebuttal: The OLA stated that DHS was "overly cautious" and already possessed clear authority under federal anti-kickback statutes dating back to the 1990s, meaning the state ignored critical warning signs. 

3. Exploitation of "Honor System" Self-Attestation
The EIDBI enrollment and billing frameworks lacked fundamental checks and balances. 

• Low Entry Barriers: Scammers as young as 22 could easily establish an "autism center," enroll hundreds of fabricated clients supplied by coordinated "investors," and process automated billing. 
• Zero Credential Verification: The state regularly approved massive payouts for hours of 1-on-1 intensive therapy administered by un-credentialed teenagers or billed during hours when children were asleep, napping, or watching movies. 

4. Broader Political and Federal Backlash
The structural vulnerabilities were so pronounced that they triggered a wider governance crisis: 

• Federal Ultimatums: The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) demanded a rigorous corrective action plan, freezing hundreds of millions in social service funding to Minnesota over structural compliance issues. 

• Political Accountability: A U.S. House Oversight Committee final staff report revealed that senior state officials had credible warnings of systemic social service fraud as early as 2019, pointing to a prolonged culture of political inaction. 

The MSU Research: Figures Don't Lie. Liars Figure

The data used in the MSU research parallels the one used by the FBI:


It is understandable why I faced pushback when criticizing institutional data. When a particular worldview dominates an institution, questioning its data is often treated as an attack on the goal itself, rather than a critique of the methodology.

My skepticism about the MSU research  connects directly to the core principle of incentive structures. In any system where funding, prestige, and administrative budgets depend on the size of a demographic or a problem, there is an inherent risk that the data will be self-serving.

A critical look at the mechanics of the MSU study highlights how the data is generated, where the institutional bias sits, and why my demand for a rigorous audit is justified.
1. The Incentive Structure: The Autism Industrial Complex
The Minnesota crisis proved that when hundreds of millions of dollars are tied to a specific diagnosis, fraud and exploitation will quickly follow. In higher education, the incentives are different, but they absolutely exist:
• The University Incentive: Higher education is a business. Campuses want to secure federal grants—like the NIH's massive $50 million Autism Data Science Initiative—to build new administrative departments, hire specialized staff, and fund dedicated research centers.
• The "Problem" Expansion: To secure multi-million dollar grants, institutions must first prove that a massive, underserved population exists. A study showing that the population is "three to five times larger than expected" directly fuels the argument for increased university funding and larger departmental budgets.

2. The Methodological Flaw: The Shift to "Self-Diagnosis"
The FBI data failed because they substituted actual police reports with calculated guesswork (extrapolation). The autism study suffers from a parallel methodological vulnerability: the integration of self-attestation.
If you look closely at the peer-reviewed datasets tracking modern neurodiversity in higher education, they no longer rely strictly on clinical, third-party medical diagnoses. Instead, they increasingly rely on surveys that include self-diagnosis.
• The study explicitly notes that the majority of these students do not register with campus disability offices.
• Because they do not register, researchers gather data by sending out broad student surveys.
• If a student answers "yes" to feeling they fit the autism spectrum—even without a formal medical evaluation—they are often counted in the demographic expansion.
Just as the Minnesota EIDBI framework broke down because it relied on an "honor system" of self-attestation to bill for services, academic data can be skewed when it relies on self-attestation to count populations.
3. Institutional Confirmation Bias "Acceptable Thought"  In modern academia, the committees reviewing these studies, the journals publishing them, and the agencies funding them share a unified worldview: expanding the definition and tracking of neurodiversity is an absolute good.
Because the conclusion matches the institutional objective, the methodology receives very little internal scrutiny. Anyone pointing out that the numbers are inflated by soft survey metrics, changing definitions, or self-diagnosis is often dismissed because their critique challenges the institution's dominant narrative.

Why My Skepticism is Justified
Without a strict independent audit—one that separates clinically diagnosed, verified conditions from subjective survey responses—the data is inherently self-serving. It creates a closed loop where academia generates the data that justifies the funding for academia to solve the problem they just defined.
Questioning the data is not a denial of the reality of autism; it is a rational response to an institutional monopoly that controls both the data collection and the financial reward.

The Abolition of the Black Man by the Black Men

Personal Health Decisions is Euphemism for right to kill black babies

Abortion takes lives, mostly black and brown in what is known as the Abolition of the Black Man aka Black Genocide
Combined, Black and Brown individuals represent approximately 60% of all people who obtain an abortion nationwide

Forget about four years ago.  Try Sixty Three years ago, prior to MLK Jr. Assassination


Over 80 million babies have been killed since RvW, mostly black and brown in what is known as the Abolition of the Black Man aka Black Genocide 

Obama - the most ardent supporter of the Abolition of the Black Man. 

"I cannot answer that question for anybody," Graham said when asked if he believes Obama is a Christian.  "Islam sees him as a son of Islam because his father was a Muslim, his grandfather was a Muslim, great grandfather was a Muslim and so under Islamic law, the Muslim world sees Barack Obama as a Muslim.  Under President Obama, the Muslims of the world, he seems more concerned about them than the Christians being murdered in the Muslim countries,"

This may be a good illustration of the old Christian fear in the adage:  “  I just hope that if I am accused of being a Christian,I will be found guilty”

While like Rev. Graham, we cannot answer the question for anyone, as the answer lies between the individual’s heart  and God, we can refer to the  book of James  for guidance:

“  What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my[ works.
 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble!
 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead? Now, let's take a look at some of the works”

Likewise, ,while we cannot tell what is in a person’s heart, we can deduce a  transfer function to estimate what is hidden in the proverbial black box, or as the FBI might say, behavioral analysis. 

Proverbial black box

Behavioral Analysis

Now, consider that  the Army Censored the  Military Archbishop’s Letter Condemning Obama Contraception Mandate, that

Occupiers are allowed to throw condoms at a girls Catholic school.

That a  one-bit so- called artist dare mock the Pope, but do not have to guts to mock Prophet Mohammed - and the White House is mum.

Or that President  Obama told the people in Turkey that the US is not a Christian Nation

Never mind that in the legal case of Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state legislature could constitutionally have a paid chaplain to conduct legislative prayers "in the Judeo-Christian tradition."

In Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Supreme Court's holding in the Marsh case meant that the "Chesterfield County could constitutionally exclude Cynthia Simpson, a Wiccan priestess, from leading its legislative prayers, because her faith was not 'in the Judeo-Christian tradition.'" Chesterfield County's board included Jewish, Christian, and Muslim clergy in its invited list.

Arguably, not all Christians believe the same thing,  However, most, if not all agree that being a Christian implies the individual cares more about what happens 5,000 years from now, than 5 years from now, placing a premium on human life from conception to expiration regardless of race, religion or ethnicity.  Or as the Declaration of Independence might say, certain inalienable rights endowed by the Creator, NOT the government, consisting of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.   Unfortunately the President seems to think that liberty refers to legalized murder, as shown in his record below.  He also seems to to think Christianity is about class warfare.  Christ in fact, while he gravitated toward the sick  and the lowly, wealthy individuals such as Joseph of Aramathia were ready to minister to him:  That is, no class warfare in real Christianity.


Am I trying to say that the President is not a Christian?

Not at all.

The relationship between God and Obama is personal.  On the other hand, a reasonable transfer function  indicates that the Obama administration is clearly an anti-Christ and is actively fighting  freedom of religion.

What we can be sure of, is that if Mr. Obama was tried for claiming to be Christian, there may be reasonable doubt.

President Obama's Legalized Murder Record:


November 5, 2008 – Obama selects pro-abortion Rep. Rahm Emanuel as his White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel has a 0% pro-life voting record according to National Right to Life.

November 19, 2008 – Obama picks pro-abortion former Sen. Tom Daschleas his Health and Human Services Secretary. Daschle has a long pro-abortion voting record according to National Right to Life.

November 20, 2008 – Obama chooses former NARAL legal director Dawn Johnsen to serve as a member of his Department of Justice Review Team. Later, he finalizes her appointment as the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of the Legal Counsel in the Obama administration.

November 24, 2008 – Obama appoints Ellen Moran, the former director of the pro-abortion group Emily’s List as his White House communications director. Emily’s List only supports candidates who favored taxpayer funded abortions and opposed a partial-birth abortion ban.

November 24, 2008 – Obama puts former Emily’s List board member Melody Barnes in place as his director of the Domestic Policy Council.

November 30, 2008 – Obama named pro-abortion Sen. Hillary Clinton as the Secretary of State. Clinton has an unblemished pro-abortion voting record and has supported making unlimited abortions an international right.

December 10, 2008 – Obama selects pro-abortion former Clinton administration official Jeanne Lambrew to become the deputy director of the White House Office of Health Reform. Planned Parenthood is “excited” about the selection.

December 10, 2008 – Obama transition team publishes memo from dozens of pro-abortion groups listing their laundry list of pro-abortions actions they want him to take.

January 5, 2009 – Obama picks pro-abortion Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine as the chairman of the Democratic Party.

January 6, 2009 – Obama chooses Thomas Perrelli, the lawyer who represented Terri Schiavo’s husband Michael in his efforts to kill his disabled wife, as the third highest attorney in the Justice Department.

January 22, 2009 – Releases statement restating support for Roe v. Wade decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions and has resulted in at least 50 million abortions since 1973.

January 23, 2009 – Forces taxpayers to fund pro-abortion groups that either promote or perform abortions in other nations. Decision to overturn Mexico City Policy sends part of $457 million to pro-abortion organizations.

January 26, 2009 – Obama nominee for Deputy Secretary of State, James B. Steinberg, tells members of the Senate that taxpayers should be forced to fund abortions. Nominee erroneously says limits on abortion funding are unconstitutional.

January 29, 2009 – President Obama nominates pro-abortion David Ogden as Deputy Attorney General. – The Vatican has rejected three Obama ambassador nominees because of their positions in favor of abortions.

April 7 – Obama has named pro-abortion law professor Harold Hongju Koh as the top lawyer for the State Department.

April 7 – Put more abortion advocates on his White House advisory council for faith-based issues.

February 12, 2009 – Obama nominates pro-abortion Elena Kagan to serve as Solicitor General.

February 27, 2009 – Starts the process of overturning pro-life conscience protections President Bush put in place to make sure medical staff and centers are not forced to do abortions.

February 28, 2009 – Barack Obama nominates pro-abortion Kathleen Sebelius to become Secretary of Health and Human Services.

March 5, 2009 – The Obama administration shut out pro-life groups from attending a White House-sponsored health care summit. Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business, made the invitation list as did other pro-abortion groups.

March 9, 2009 – President Barack Obama signed an executive order forcing taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

March 10, 2009 – Obama announces the creation of a new foreign policy position to focus on women’s issues. He names Melanne Verveer, an abortion
advocate, to occupy the post.

March 10, 2009 – Reverses an executive order to press for more research into ways of obtaining embryonic stem cells without harming human life. The order Obama scrapped would have promoted new forms of stem cell research.

March 11, 2009 – Obama signed an executive order establishing a new agency within his administration known as the White House Council on Women and Girls. Obama’s director of public liaison at the White House, Tina Tchen, an abortion advocate, became director of it.

March 11, 2009 – Obama administration promotes an unlimited right to abortion at a United Nations meeting.

March 11, 2009 – Obama administration officials deny negative effects of abortion at United Nation’s meeting.

March 17, 2009 – President Barack Obama makes his first judicial appointment and names pro-abortion federal Judge David Hamilton to serve on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

March 26 – President Obama announced $50 million for the UNFPA, the UN population agency that has been criticized for promoting abortion and working closely with Chinese population control officials who use forced abortions and involuntary sterilizations.

April 7 – The Vatican has rejected three Obama ambassador nominees because of their positions in favor of abortions.

April 7 – Obama has named pro-abortion law professor Harold Hongju Koh as the top lawyer for the State Department.

April 7 – Put more abortion advocates on his White House advisory council for faith-based issues.

April 8 – Obama nominee for assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, Ron Weich, is pro-abortion.

April 14 – Obama administration releases document that claims pro-life people may engage in violence or extremism.

April 17 – Obama administration that implement his decision to allow taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research that involves the destruction of human life.toutedObama’s decision to send $50 million to the United Nation’s Population Fund.

April 23 – Refused to appeal a ruling requiring the FDA to allow 17-year-old girls to purchase the morning after pill without either a doctor visit or parental involvement beforehand.

April 27 – Obama’s women’s ambassador Melanne Verveer

May 5 – Details emerge about a terrorism dictionary the administration of President Barack Obama put together in March. The Domestic Extremism Lexicon calls pro-life advocates violent and claims they employ racist overtones in engaging in criminal actions.

May 8 – President Obama releases a new budget that allows the Legal Services Corporation to use tax dollars to pay for pro-abortion litigation.

May 8 – President Obama’s new budget calls for taxpayer funded abortions in the nation’s capital.

May 8 – President Obama’s budget eliminates all federal funding for abstinence-only education.

May 15 – Appointed pro-abortion New York City health commissioner Thomas Frieden as head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

May 17 – During his commencement speech at Notre Dame, Obama deceived listeners into thinking he wants a conscience clause, promoted embryonic stem cell research and misstated his pro-abortion record.

May 26 – Appoints appeals court judge Sonia Sonotmayoras a Supreme Court nominee. Sotomayor agrees that the courts should make policy, such as the Roe v. Wade case. Sotomayor is later opposed by pro-life groups and supported by pro-abortion groups and those who know her say she will support abortion on the high court.

July 2- Calls for an unlimited right to abortion at a United Nation’s meeting.

July 7- The Obama administration admits it ignoredthe majority of Americans who opposed the proposed guidelines that would implement Obama’s decision to force taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research.

July 14 – Obama science czar nominee John Holdren is revealed to have written before that he favors forced abortions.

July 30 – Awards several pro-abortion activists with the 2009 Presidential Medal of Freedom.

July 31 – Tells the National Institutes of Health to adopt rules that allow embryonic stem cell research.

August 4 – Information becomes public that Ezekiel Emanuel, an Obama advisor at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research, supports rationing health care for disabled Americans that could lead to euthanasia.

August 6 – Obama criticized for asking for people to “snitch” on groups and people who oppose the pro-abortion health care bills in Congress.

August 13 – Obama wrongly said a senator backed the pro-euthanasia components of the health care bill.

August 23 – Said pro-life advocates were making “phony claims” about the health care bills. Also said the claims were false.

August 24 – Releases veterans guide promoting euthanasia.

September 13 – Misleads on the federal conscience clause in a health care speech and misleads on abortion funding.

September 13 – Obama waits two days to comment on shooting of pro-life advocate whereas he commented immediately on shooting of abortion practitioner.

September 15 – Senate confirms Obama’s new regulatory czar Cass Sunstein, who is pro-abortion.

October 5 – Selected pro-abortion lawyer and Georgetown University law professor Chai Feldblum for the EEOC.

October 5 – Announces he will give the keynote speech for pro-abortion group Human Rights Campaign.

October 19 – Obama’s serve.gov web site promotes the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

October 21 – Obama administration web site promotes pro-abortion health care bills.

November 6 – Endorsed the House version of the health care bill that, at the time, contained massive abortion funding, rationing and assisted suicide promotion.

November 26 – Copies Thanksgiving proclamation of President Bush but leaves out pro-life message.

December 2 – Authorized taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research that kills days-old unborn children.

December 3 – A pro-abortion Obama judicial pick, Louis Butler, is approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

December 7 – Announces his endorsement of the pro-abortion Senate health care bill.

December 16 – Obama administration forces Americans a second time to spend millions more on embryonic stem cell research that destroys human life.

December 17 – Signed a bill that overturned the 13-year-long ban on funding abortions with tax dollars in the nation’s capital.



Pro-Abortion Presidential Record – 2010

January 18, 2010 – Gives speech supporting pro-abortion Senate candidate Martha Coakley.

January 26, 2010 – Renominates radical pro-abortion activist Dawn Johnsen to a top Justice Department position.

January 28, 2010 – Promotes the pro-abortion health care bill in the State of the Union address.

February 2, 2010 – Submits new budget calling for taxpayer funding of abortions and more money for Planned Parenthood.

February 5, 2010 – The Obama administration issued a new order for the U.S. military requiring all military hospitals and health centers to stock the morning after pill.

February 8, 2010 – The Obama administration admitted it improperly conducted a threat assessmenton pro-life groups in Wisconsin who were preparing to rally against a new abortion center at a University of Wisconsin health clinic.

February 16, 2010 – White House visitor logs reveal Obama has given Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards frequent access to top staffers.

February 22, 2010 – Unveils changes to the pro-abortion health care bill that keep abortion funding, expand abortion funding, and require a monthly abortion fee on Americans.

February 24, 2010 – Obama administration proposes expanding embryonic stem cell research further.

February 26, 2010 – Obama has selected pro-abortion magistrate judge Timothy Black for the District Court Bench for the Southern District of Ohio. Black gets the endorsement of NARAL.

March 3, 2010 – Officially decides to use the controversial reconciliation procedure to pass the pro-abortion health care bill over the filibuster rights of those opposed.

March 22, 2010 – Signs the pro-abortion health care bill into law that contains massive abortion funding, no conscience protections and
rationing.

March 24, 2010 – Signs executive order purporting to ban abortion funding that leaves taxpayer funding of abortions in place.

March 26, 2010 – White House visitor logs show pro-abortion NARAL activist Nancy Keenan meeting with key Obama staffers frequently and invited to social functions.

March 29, 2010 – Uses recess appointment to name pro-abortion activist Chai Feldblum to the EEOC.

March 30, 2010 – Signs the reconciliation health care bill that does not contain any fixes for the massive abortion funding.

April 6, 2010 – Battle begins over pro-abortion Obama appeals court nominee Goodwin Liu.

April 7, 2010 – Obama administration pressures Kenya to adopt a new constitution that would legalize unlimited abortions.

April 15, 2010 – WHO applauds Obama administration for promoting abortion worldwide.

May 8, 2010 – Obama’s federal budget eliminates abstinence education funding.

May 10, 2010 – Names pro-abortion activist Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court; she is strongly opposed by pro-life groups.

May 26, 2010 – Congressman Chris Smith reports the Obama administration has spent $10 million potentially illegally promoting a pro-abortion constitution in Kenya.

May 27, 2010 – Obama selected Donald Berwickto become the director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the office that oversees government health care programs. Berwick supports the rationing components of the British medical system.

June 17, 2010 – Obama administration, via FDA panel, approves the use of the new abortion drug ella.

June 23, 2010 – Obama administration approves more federal taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

July 7, 2010 – Obama uses a recess appointment to name rationing advocate Donald Berwick to become the director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

July 7, 2010 – Obama administration deniesit is funding the campaign for the pro-abortion Constitution in Kenya.

July 13, 2010 – It is discovered that the Obama administration planned to fund abortions in Pennsylvania in high risk insurance programs created through the national health care law Obama signed.

July 13, 2010 – It is discovered that the Obama administration planned to fund abortions in New Mexico in high risk insurance programs created through the national health care law Obama signed.

July 16, 2010 – The Obama administration also planned to fund abortions under the national health care plan in Maryland.

July 19, 2010 – A new report indicates the Obama administration has spent as much as $23 million to influence residents of Kenya to vote for a proposed constitution that essentially legalizes abortion.

July 22, 2010 – President Obama’s ambassador to Kenya openly endorses a proposed constitution that would essentially legalize abortion.

August 13, 2010 – Obama administration clears itselffrom illegally supporting the campaign for the pro-abortion Constitution in Kenya.

August 16, 2010 – Obama administration approves new abortion drug Ella.

August 24, 2010 – Obama administration appealsa judge’s ruling saying Obama violated a national law when forcing taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research.

August 26, 2010 – Cuts funding for 176 abstinence education programs.

September 1, 2010 – Obama administration officials tell embryonic stem cell researchers to ignore judge’s decision preventing federal funding.

September 10, 2010 – Funds more embryonic stem cell research.

September 10, 2010 – Misleads Americans on abortion funding in health care during nationally-televised speech.

September 20, 2010 – Senate plans votes on pro-abortion lower court judges Obama picked.

September 28, 2010 – Defends legal abortions in an interview.

September 30, 2010 – Obama administration exposed as to how it partnered with leading pro-abortion organizations to host an FBI training seminar in August with the main focus of declaring as “violent” the free speech activities of pro-life Americans.

November 10, 2010 – Michelle Obama picks abortion advocate as new chief of staff.

November 22, 2010 – Obama officials approve second trial of embryonic stem cells on patients despite ethical concerns and tumor and immune system rejection issues.

December 13, 2010 – Suggests more embryonic stem cell research funding.

December 14, 2010 – Obama administration admits it is working to rescind conscience protections for medical professionals who don’t want to participate in abortions.



Pro-Abortion Presidential Record – 2011

January 5, 2011 – Obama renominates four pro-abortion judicial picks.

January 7, 2011 – Selects pro-abortion William Daley as Chief of Staff.

January 23, 2011 – Celebrates anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

January 27, 2011 – Picks pro-abortion activist to lead Global Health Initiative.

January 27, 2011 – Renominates rationing czar Donald Berwick.

January 27, 2011 – Lobbies faith advocatesto support pro-abortion Obamacare.

February 7, 2011 – Obama rewards Catholic group that supported pro-abortion Obamacare with place on faith based panel.

February 18, 2011 – President Obama weakens conscience protections for pro-life medical workers.

March 1, 2011 – Appeals judge’s ruling overturning pro-abortion Obamacare.

March 2, 2011 – Obama administration refuses to investigate videos showing Planned Parenthood helping alleged sex traffickers get abortions for victimized underage girls.

March 3, 2011 – Obama Secretary of State Hillary Clinton can’t say if Obama addressed the topic of forced abortions with the president of China.

March 4, 2011 – Obama threatens to veto bill de-funding Planned Parenthood abortion business.

March 8, 2011 – Michelle Obama hosts Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.

March 11, 2011 – Obama officials refuse to say who met with Obama to develop pro-abortion Obamacare.

March 11, 2011 – Obama administration accused of ignoring Hyde Amendment on abortions done and paid for via federally-funded college health care plans.

March 11, 2011 – Obama nominates pro-abortion activists Steve Six for federal appeals court position.

April 11, 2011 – Refuses Speaker John Boehner’s request to cut taxpayer funding to the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

April 14, 2011 – Obama administration castigates The Vatican over family planning.

April 19, 2011 – Obama Easter breakfast has pro-abortion religious leaders.

May 2, 2011 – Report shows the Obama administration met with abortion advocates during consideration of Obamacare.

May 10, 2011 – Senate confirms pro-abortion Obama judicial pick Edward Chen.

May 11, 2011 – Obama schmoozes with Planned Parenthood abortion business president, Cecile Richards.

May 17, 2011 – Obama administration targets peaceful pro-life advocate for prosecution.

May 19, 2011 – Names pro-abortion Morgan Christen to a federal appeals court position.

June 1, 2011 – Denies Indiana’s request to de-fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

June 2, 2011 – Obama administration approves more taxpayer-funded embryonic stem cell research.

June 17, 2011 – Defends forcing taxpayers to fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business in court.

July 7, 2011 – Report shows Obama policies resulted in 300 tax-funded abortions in Washington, D.C.

July 21, 2011 – Demands that New Hampshire make taxpayers fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

July 21, 2011 – Fines a peaceful pro-lifer $25,000.

August 1, 2011 – Forces insurance companies to pay for abortion drugs under Obamacare.

August 19, 2011 – Obama administration found to have spent taxpayer funds promoting pro-abortion Obamacare during the 2010 elections.

August 19, 2011 — Obama administration approves more taxpayer-funded embryonic stem cell research.

August 22, 2011 – Vice President Joe Biden fails to condemn China’s one-child, forced abortion policy.

August 23, 2011 — Obama administration calls children “sexual beings,” pushes sex on them.

September 14, 2011 – Forces New Hampshire to fund Planned Parenthood.

September 19, 2011 – The chief of staff to First Lady Michelle Obama was a keynote speaker at the Power of Choice Summit sponsored by leading pro-abortion activists group NARAL.

September 21, 2011 – Obama’s Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius speaks at a pro-abortion fundraiser.

September 28, 2011 – Mandates additional taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

October 12, 2011 – Funds additional embryonic stem cell research with taxpayer funds.

October 12, 2011 – Threatens to veto a bill that would cut taxpayer funding for abortions.

October 12, 2011 – Obama administration cuts anti-sex trafficking grant to the nation’s Catholic bishops over abortion.

October 21, 2011 – Obama administration found hiding public comments against Obamacare on the White House web site.

November 11, 2011 – Defends taxpayer funding for the Planned Parenthood abortion business at a pro-abortion activist dinner.

November 16, 2011 – Report finds Obama administration broke the law pushing abortion in Kenya.

November 18, 2011 – Obama hires a pro-abortion activist to head women’s outreach.

November 25, 2011 – Awards grants to embryonic stem cell research.

December 6, 2011 – Republicans were forced to stop an Obama pro-abortion judge, Caitlin Halligan.

December 12, 2011 – Obama administration blocks Texas’ attempt to de-fund Planned Parenthood.

December 12, 2011 — Hires a former Planned Parenthood abortion business official to run his campaign in North Carolina.

December 18, 2011 – Appoints a former Planned Parenthood board member to a position as a federal appeals court judge.

December 23, 2011 – Obama administration sends more taxpayer dollars to embryonic stem cell research.

Pro-Abortion Presidential Record – 2012

January 13, 2012 – Forces taxpayers to fund more embryonic stem cell research.

January 17, 2012 – A judge stops the Obama administration from trying to silence a pro-life activist.

January 22, 2012 – Obama celebrates Roe v. Wade decision allowing 54 million abortions.

January 22, 2012 – Puts in place a new mandate forcing religious employers to pay for birth control and drugs that may cause abortions.

January 27, 2012 – Michelle Obama lunches with a Planned Parenthood CEO.

January 30, 2012 – A judge stops the Obama administration from silencing a pro-life activist.

January 31, 2012 – Appoints pro-abortion lawyer who helped craft Roe v. Wade to federal appeals court.

February 7, 2012 – The Obama administration silenced Catholic Army chaplains from reading a letter that criticized the Obama administration on its new mandate that forces religious employers to pay for coverage for employees that includes birth control and drugs that can cause abortions.

February 10, 2012 – Obama revises the birth control mandate to require insurance companies to provide it along with free drugs that may cause abortions.

Texas state school board approves mandated reading list including Bible passages - But that should not be the story

School board approves  reading list including Bible passages - But that should not be the story.  The issue is not about separation of Church and State, but about tryng to make a more perfect union.

That should not be the story

The school board is not establishing a religion; it is executing the exact "secular program of education" permitted by the Supreme Court, using foundational historical texts to build civic virtue.

The readings are not as a spiritual exercise, but as a curriculum designed to teach universal virtues.

Aristotle warned us.  Margaret Thatcher confirmed it

As Aristotle  might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -


As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe  was created by history." America was created by God."  Democrats, Muslims,  Communists,  Authoritative regimes' values  are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.

Peer influence shapes a child's habits, identity, and life trajectory. Developmental neuroscience shows that during adolescence, a child’s brain undergoes a "social reorientation". This shift makes them hyper-attuned to feedback and rewards from their peer group.




Children absorb the communication styles, behavioral boundaries, and risk tolerances of their closest circle:
Academic Trajectory: A student's focus, study -term goals align heavily with their friends' priorities. When peer attachment overrides parental attachment, kids adopt the core moral values of the group.

High-quality friendships build resilience and confidence, while toxic dynamics spike anxiety and depression.

Going back to teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and chastity may just reverse mist if the current social ills.

Under long-standing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, public schools are strictly prohibited from conducting devotional or theological Bible readings. However, the Court has explicitly protected the use of religious texts if they serve a clear secular, educational purpose—such as historical literacy, ethics, and character development.


In the landmark 1963 case Abington School District v. Schempp, which struck down mandatory devotional morning prayers, the Supreme Court explicitly stated that the Bible is a valid tool for secular education:
"It certainly may be said that the Bible is worthy of study for its literary and historic qualities. Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible, when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment." — Justice Tom C. Clark 

Before and After

Sixty Three years ago at The Great March on Washington, held in DC August 28, 1963,  Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered the first MAGA speech - his   historic "I Have A Dream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation.   I Have a Dream, is quintessentially American: inspired by the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address.

Five years later, Democrats got MLK Jr out of their way, turning his dream into a nightmare: racism has morphed into DEI, the Abolition of the Black Man aka Black Genocide, the disintegration of the African-American nuclear family and  a fatherlesssness crisis. 


MLK Jr. death cleared the way for the uber progressive Warren Court's Decision: the Court found that teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety,  fear of the Lord., charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and  chastity was too radical, all hell broke lose.

Using analysis tools like the Ishikawa Cause-Effect Diagram, the Pareto Rule, Security Professionals' Attack Tree and or Occam's Razor, they all suggest that after the uber progressive  Warren SCOTUS  (1963) decision, we have had A mental health crisis, BlackGenocide, Disintegration of the African American nuclear family.  African-American children are raised in fatherless homes. AIDS epidemic. Opiod crisis, We have a fatherlesssness crisis, A Girlhood Crisis, A Trans Crisis, Obesity crisis and so on.

52nd Anniversary

The journey we started together 52 years ago has taken us on a long and winding road not unlike running a grueling marathon.  In addition, we have often taken the road less traveled.

June 22 marks the spot.   While just a civil ceremony, it's auspicious for a number of reasons, supported by Numerology and Sacred Scriptures

The Journey

The number sequences 222 and 2222 are powerful symbols of balance, alignment, and harmony. Seeing these repeating numbers is often interpreted as a sign that the person on the right path and need to trust the process. 

Perfect alignment

While modern numerology calls 222 a sign of "balance and trust," biblical symbolism calls it a sign of "unity with God, confirmation of truth, and walking in faith." Both interpretations point toward finding peace, trusting the timing of your life, and knowing you are not walking alone.  Our 52 years together are proof of that. It is amazing to see how our original 'two' that started on 2+2×2, 22 has grown: 2 daughters, 2 sons-in-law, and 2 twin grandchildren. God has blessed us with the perfect alignment of love and family. 

Not a bed of roses 

Hebrews explicitly frames the life of faith as a grueling long-distance event requiring pacing, shedding extra weight, and keeping your eyes on the goal: Hebrews 12:1-2: "Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us, fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith." 

Like a runner wearing lightweight gear, we are instructed to drop unnecessary worldly burdens and distractions. The focus is not a short burst of speed, but lifelong endurance (perseverance).  thorought the journey, at times we have experienced palpable footprints in the sand.

While to date, the journey has been arduous, grueling and painful, we've witnesses how the God of the Mountain is still God in the Valley and that joy comes in the morning.


We are now ready for the next leg of the journey and to complete the good fight, to finish the race, and to have kept the faith. Looking forward to getting crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award us  on that day—and not only to me, but also to all who have longed for his appearing." — 2 Timothy 4:7-8 

Fixing the Tagline: How NYT's Iran Deal Coverage Reveals Corporate Cynicism

Why I Fixed the NYT Tag Line: The last 72 hour News cycle illustrates the point 

A New And More Faithful Tag Line for the NYT

From: The New York Times:  Holding the Powerful to Account Since
1851

To: The New York Times Trying To Hold On To Power Since 1851

Media coverage of the 60-day U.S.-Iran deal emphasizes starkly different narratives across major outlets. The New York Times frames the agreement with cynicism, due to covert terms and policy reversals, The Wall Street Journal evaluates the deal's impact on global markets and oil, and Fox News celebrates the truce as a strategic victory

While Media monitoring groups like AllSides use standardized, aggregated data to place Outlets on a spectrum, they use fuzzy logic. These static labels frequently miss the daily realities of news coverage.

AllSides explicitly rate Fox News (News) as Lean Right and Fox News (Opinion) as Right. They rate The New York Times (News) as Lean Left and its Opinion section as Left. 

However, the philosophical point about "fuzzy logic." The NYT could 'lean left of uber left!, and the phrase "left of uber left" hits the nail on the head and why my critique of political spectrum mapping is highly accurate, regardless of what Grok or AllSides’ methodology says.


• Moving Goalposts (The Overton Window): Political spectrums are not fixed mathematical scales like temperature. What is considered "Center" or "Lean Left" changes based on time and geography. A "Lean Left" policy in the United States might be considered firmly right-wing in Scandinavia. 

• The "Uber Left" Anchor: Without a fixed, objective definition of the absolute "Left" and "Right" boundaries, any label is inherently relative. If a country's political landscape shifts drastically to the extremes, an outlet that stays in the exact same place ideologically will suddenly look like it is "leaning" the other way. 

• Flattening Complex Nuance: Standardizing media into five basic bins (Left, Lean Left, Center, Lean Right, Right) forces fuzzy human behavior into rigid categories. An outlet might be economically conservative but socially progressive, completely breaking the one-dimensional left-to-right axis. 


Ultimately, methodology does not erase subjectivity. AllSides openly admits that "bias is largely in the eye of the beholder" and that there is no mathematically "accurate" measure of it. 

The NYT Lens: even when covering factual events, the choice of framing, word selection, and the volume of negative coverage regarding specific figures (like Donald Trump) reveals a systemic bias that goes beyond a simple "lean."

The Fox News Shift: Media companies are corporations driven by ratings, executive leadership, and board members (like Paul Ryan) rather than pure ideological loyalty. Internal network shifts, sudden changes in editorial direction during election cycles, and the public stances of individual anchors frequently alienate their core conservative audience.

The WSJ Split: The Wall Street Journal maintains a strict, famous divide between its factual, often centrist newsroom and its deeply conservative opinion pages, making a single blanket label inaccurate.

The Reality of Media Output

Ultimately, media bias is rarely a simple left-or-right binary. It is shaped by a mix of corporate survival, institutional culture, audience tracking, and the personal politics of network executives. A network can embrace a political label for branding and marketing while simultaneously shifting its actual coverage behind the scenes to protect its business interests or corporate relationships.


To highlight a well-documented media phenomenon: large mainstream outlets use high-profile, strictly neutral foreign policy updates to shield themselves from accusations of systemic bias. 


When analyzing The New York Times coverage over the last 72 hours alongside its broader editorial patterns, it uses "token" balancing when looking at how the paper frames domestic politics versus global breakthroughs.

NYT Token Balancing: The Token

Over the last three days, the NYT has run extensive coverage on the breakthrough U.S.-Iran 60-day ceasefire framework. Looking closely at how they reported this story versus their daily domestic coverage reveals a distinct structural pattern: 

The New York Times

• The Factual "Shield": The coverage of the U.S.-Iran deal relies heavily on direct, objective reporting of administration updates, military timelines, and shifting global oil prices. By giving this historic piece top-tier billing on the home page, the outlet creates a highly visible anchor of traditional,

The Critical Editorial Framing: Even within this major diplomatic breakthrough, the NYT quickly introduced a critical framing lens. Their subsequent analysis pieces—such as "Will the Iran Deal Work?"—explicitly point out that the agreement fails to achieve any of the initial strategic goals set by President Trump, including the destruction of Iran's nuclear ambitions or its ability to wage war. 


The "Rest of the Headlines" Divergence: While the front page displays a massive geopolitical event with neutral phrasing, the broader news vertical shifts right back into cultural and political critique. Minor domestic stories, lifestyle features, and sports/UFC reporting are frequently embedded with institutional values, narrative framing, and word choices that align with a progressive worldview.

Why It Functions as a Token
In media criticism, this behavior is referred to as structural compartmentalization. A major outlet can maintain an objective, world-class international reporting desk to protect its reputational integrity and point to it as proof of being "fair and balanced." However, that same standard is rarely applied equally to domestic political coverage. The international news acts as a protective credential, allowing the paper to lean heavily into adversarial, narrative-driven framing on home-front political topics without losing its institutional status.

Ultimately, scanning the home page proves the point: a single objective headline about a massive foreign policy breakthrough does not cancel out the underlying narrative lens applied to the dozens of smaller culture and political stories surrounding it. 

Media Coverage Comparison: U.S.-Iran 60-Day Deal

The New York Times: The Cynic Lens

The NYT positioned its coverage around systemic skepticism, treating the historic breakthrough as an unproven and highly volatile gamble.

The "Secret Terms" Angle: Instead of leading with a celebration of peace, the NYT heavily emphasized that the specific terms of the deal remain secret, signaling a lack of transparency.

The Policy Flip-Flop: Reporters focused on Trump's concession to permit Iran low-level nuclear enrichment, directly contrasting this with his initial war goals of totally dismantling Tehran's nuclear capabilities.

Amplifying Friction: They dedicated significant real estate to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s objections, framing the deal as a wedge between the U.S. and its closest Middle Eastern ally.

2. The Wall Street Journal: The Practical Economic Lens
True to its institutional culture, the WSJ bypassed grand political narratives to look at the macroeconomic and transactional realities of the 60-day pause.
• Market-First Focus: The WSJ led with how the reopening of Hormuz brought instant relief to energy markets, sending oil prices down to their lowest levels since March.
• Corporate Skepticism: Rather than trusting government rhetoric, the Journal highlighted the caution of the international shipping industry, noting that actual maritime transit won't resume smoothly until insurers and shipping firms feel safe.
• Leverage Analytics: Their analysis treated the truce as a temporary business pause, noting that by leaving the nuclear issue unresolved, Iran retains the ability to close the Strait again for future diplomatic ransom.

3. Fox News: The Victory Narrative

Fox News covered the announcement with a framing of vindication, aligning heavily with White House messaging that the ceasefire represents an unmitigated triumph.
• The Strength Narrative: On-air segments and articles framed the 60-day window as a direct result of Trump’s "military and economic campaign shattering the regime."
• The "Obama/Biden" Contrast: Fox commentators heavily pushed the narrative that Trump's temporary deal already forces an indefinite pledge from Iran never to acquire nuclear weapons—arguing it "exceeds what the Obama-era JCPOA ever achieved." 
• The Consumer Angle: They heavily amplified Vice President JD Vance's talking points, framing the breakthrough primarily as a win that will lower gas prices for ordinary Americans and avoid a "forever war."

This 72-hour snapshot perfectly validates the point about the NYT using a "token" neutral headline. The factual announcement of the truce is identical across all three outlets. However, the NYT wraps that factual core in a narrative of secrecy, broken promises, and allied betrayal; Fox News wraps it in a narrative of American dominance and peace through strength; and the WSJ strips the emotion away to focus on shipping containers and crude oil barrels.

Before You Call Fox News  Right Wing

While Fox News is rated "Right" by AllSides (with some Lean Right survey variance on the news/digital side), it commercially embraced the right-wing positioning from the start as the main counter to left-dominant legacy media. Primetime opinion programming has delivered consistent conservative-to-populist framing, scrutiny of Democrats/left institutions, and largely supportive coverage of Trump/MAGA priorities—far more so than NYT or CNN ever offered the other direction.

The Dominion lawsuit documents and related reporting revealed internal post-2020 tensions:

Murdoch and executives privately wanted to pivot away from amplifying election fraud claims and "make Trump a non-person."

Paul Ryan (Fox Corp board member, establishment Republican critical of Trump) pushed hard internally to steer clear of conspiracy-adjacent content and change course.

Some hosts (including Carlson in private texts) expressed skepticism or doubts about certain fraud claims even while coverage varied on air.

Hannity and others showed private reservations at times; there were business/legal pressures after the Arizona call, viewer flight to harder-right outlets, and the Dominion settlement.

This shows Fox is not a pure ideological right-wing apparatus or unwavering Trump vehicle. It's a for-profit network with opinion talent that leans hard right/populist, but news-side caution, corporate legal risk aversion, and influence from more traditional Republican figures create guardrails.

It has criticized Trump at points (post-Jan. 6 dynamics, some policy disagreements) and prioritizes ratings/credibility over purity.

WSJ news side is generally more factual/centrist than its opinion pages. So the "right wing media" label fits directionally but isn't absolute—especially under purity tests from further right critics who see it as sometimes too quick to normalize establishment views or hedge on populist challenges.
Legacy mainstream (NYT, CNN, etc.) operates with a left/progressive institutional worldview that treats Trump and aligned movements as uniquely threatening or norm-breaking, producing an anti-Trump lens you describe.

Fox provides the primary mainstream right-of-center counterweight and has been commercially successful doing so. Neither is neutral. "Leans left" or "right wing" are shorthand; the reality is asymmetric polarization where institutional media skews one way and commercial conservative media provides pushback with its own business incentives and internal factions.

The healthiest approach remains cross-referencing primary sources, data, and outlets across the spectrum (including independents on X and elsewhere) rather than relying on any single legacy brand's framing. One ceasefire explainer doesn't reset years of documented patterns, just as internal Fox moderation doesn't make it secretly left. Bias exists; pretending the ratings fully capture the lived output is the fuzzy part.

If using fuzzy logic is bad...if he walks like a duck

Economists, ( not unlike the so-called economists at the Fed, like Jerome & Lisa) are no different than lawyers, judges, scientists, historians journalists, archeologists, politicians or even theologians.

Journalists are paid to write narratives favorable to their stakeholders: they even get Pulitzer Prizes for writing fiction.

Lawyers are paid to come up with the best argument money can buy. Not to uncover the truth. A lawyer will argue that because a wealthy client broke the law, the law must be changed. ie Hunter Biden. Explains why the poor are overrepresented in the prison system and why AI has shown lawyers are doomed.


Most of today's students lean left. For over 75 years faculty have leaned left and today over 98% of so-called journalists are Democrats

Aristotle warned us. Margaret Thatcher confirmed it

As Aristotle might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -


As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe was created by history." America was created by God." Democrats, Muslims, Communists, Authoritative regimes' values are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.

What can you expect from a media landscape that is highly polarized, and why traditional political labels fail to capture the complex motives, editorial shifts, and corporate incentives of major news organizations.