Sunday, June 28, 2026

The Abolition of the Black Man by the Black Men


Personal Health Decisions is Euphemism for right to kill black babies



Abortion takes lives, mostly black and brown in what is known as the Abolition of the Black Man aka Black Genocide
Combined, Black and Brown individuals represent approximately 60% of all people who obtain an abortion nationwide

Forget about four years ago.  Try Sixty Three years ago, prior to MLK Jr. Assassination


Over 80 million babies have been killed since RvW, mostly black and brown in what is known as the Abolition of the Black Man aka Black Genocide 




"I cannot answer that question for anybody," Graham said when asked if he believes Obama is a Christian.  "Islam sees him as a son of Islam because his father was a Muslim, his grandfather was a Muslim, great grandfather was a Muslim and so under Islamic law, the Muslim world sees Barack Obama as a Muslim.  Under President Obama, the Muslims of the world, he seems more concerned about them than the Christians being murdered in the Muslim countries,"

This may be a good illustration of the old Christian fear in the adage:  “  I just hope that if I am accused of being a Christian,I will be found guilty”

While like Rev. Graham, we cannot answer the question for anyone, as the answer lies between the individual’s heart  and God, we can refer to the  book of James  for guidance:

“  What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my[ works.
 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble!
 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead? Now, let's take a look at some of the works”

Likewise, ,while we cannot tell what is in a person’s heart, we can deduce a  transfer function to estimate what is hidden in the proverbial black box, or as the FBI might say, behavioral analysis. 

Proverbial black box


Behavioral Analysis


Now, consider that  the Army Censored the  Military Archbishop’s Letter Condemning Obama Contraception Mandate, that

Occupiers are allowed to throw condoms at a girls Catholic school.

That a  one-bit so- called artist dare mock the Pope, but do not have to guts to mock Prophet Mohammed - and the White House is mum.

Or that President  Obama told the people in Turkey that the US is not a Christian Nation

Never mind that in the legal case of Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state legislature could constitutionally have a paid chaplain to conduct legislative prayers "in the Judeo-Christian tradition."

In Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Supreme Court's holding in the Marsh case meant that the "Chesterfield County could constitutionally exclude Cynthia Simpson, a Wiccan priestess, from leading its legislative prayers, because her faith was not 'in the Judeo-Christian tradition.'" Chesterfield County's board included Jewish, Christian, and Muslim clergy in its invited list.

Arguably, not all Christians believe the same thing,  However, most, if not all agree that being a Christian implies the individual cares more about what happens 5,000 years from now, than 5 years from now, placing a premium on human life from conception to expiration regardless of race, religion or ethnicity.  Or as the Declaration of Independence might say, certain inalienable rights endowed by the Creator, NOT the government, consisting of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.   Unfortunately the President seems to think that liberty refers to legalized murder, as shown in his record below.  He also seems to to think Christianity is about class warfare.  Christ in fact, while he gravitated toward the sick  and the lowly, wealthy individuals such as Joseph of Aramathia were ready to minister to him:  That is, no class warfare in real Christianity.


Am I trying to say that the President is not a Christian?

Not at all.

The relationship between God and Obama is personal.  On the other hand, a reasonable transfer function  indicates that the Obama administration is clearly an anti-Christ and is actively fighting  freedom of religion.

What we can be sure of, is that if Mr. Obama was tried for claiming to be Christian, there may be reasonable doubt.



President Obama's Legalized Murder Record:


November 5, 2008 – Obama selects pro-abortion Rep. Rahm Emanuel as his White House Chief of Staff. Emanuel has a 0% pro-life voting record according to National Right to Life.

November 19, 2008 – Obama picks pro-abortion former Sen. Tom Daschleas his Health and Human Services Secretary. Daschle has a long pro-abortion voting record according to National Right to Life.

November 20, 2008 – Obama chooses former NARAL legal director Dawn Johnsen to serve as a member of his Department of Justice Review Team. Later, he finalizes her appointment as the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of the Legal Counsel in the Obama administration.

November 24, 2008 – Obama appoints Ellen Moran, the former director of the pro-abortion group Emily’s List as his White House communications director. Emily’s List only supports candidates who favored taxpayer funded abortions and opposed a partial-birth abortion ban.

November 24, 2008 – Obama puts former Emily’s List board member Melody Barnes in place as his director of the Domestic Policy Council.

November 30, 2008 – Obama named pro-abortion Sen. Hillary Clinton as the Secretary of State. Clinton has an unblemished pro-abortion voting record and has supported making unlimited abortions an international right.

December 10, 2008 – Obama selects pro-abortion former Clinton administration official Jeanne Lambrew to become the deputy director of the White House Office of Health Reform. Planned Parenthood is “excited” about the selection.

December 10, 2008 – Obama transition team publishes memo from dozens of pro-abortion groups listing their laundry list of pro-abortions actions they want him to take.

January 5, 2009 – Obama picks pro-abortion Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine as the chairman of the Democratic Party.

January 6, 2009 – Obama chooses Thomas Perrelli, the lawyer who represented Terri Schiavo’s husband Michael in his efforts to kill his disabled wife, as the third highest attorney in the Justice Department.

January 22, 2009 – Releases statement restating support for Roe v. Wade decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions and has resulted in at least 50 million abortions since 1973.

January 23, 2009 – Forces taxpayers to fund pro-abortion groups that either promote or perform abortions in other nations. Decision to overturn Mexico City Policy sends part of $457 million to pro-abortion organizations.

January 26, 2009 – Obama nominee for Deputy Secretary of State, James B. Steinberg, tells members of the Senate that taxpayers should be forced to fund abortions. Nominee erroneously says limits on abortion funding are unconstitutional.

January 29, 2009 – President Obama nominates pro-abortion David Ogden as Deputy Attorney General. – The Vatican has rejected three Obama ambassador nominees because of their positions in favor of abortions.

April 7 – Obama has named pro-abortion law professor Harold Hongju Koh as the top lawyer for the State Department.

April 7 – Put more abortion advocates on his White House advisory council for faith-based issues.

February 12, 2009 – Obama nominates pro-abortion Elena Kagan to serve as Solicitor General.

February 27, 2009 – Starts the process of overturning pro-life conscience protections President Bush put in place to make sure medical staff and centers are not forced to do abortions.

February 28, 2009 – Barack Obama nominates pro-abortion Kathleen Sebelius to become Secretary of Health and Human Services.

March 5, 2009 – The Obama administration shut out pro-life groups from attending a White House-sponsored health care summit. Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business, made the invitation list as did other pro-abortion groups.

March 9, 2009 – President Barack Obama signed an executive order forcing taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

March 10, 2009 – Obama announces the creation of a new foreign policy position to focus on women’s issues. He names Melanne Verveer, an abortion
advocate, to occupy the post.

March 10, 2009 – Reverses an executive order to press for more research into ways of obtaining embryonic stem cells without harming human life. The order Obama scrapped would have promoted new forms of stem cell research.

March 11, 2009 – Obama signed an executive order establishing a new agency within his administration known as the White House Council on Women and Girls. Obama’s director of public liaison at the White House, Tina Tchen, an abortion advocate, became director of it.

March 11, 2009 – Obama administration promotes an unlimited right to abortion at a United Nations meeting.

March 11, 2009 – Obama administration officials deny negative effects of abortion at United Nation’s meeting.

March 17, 2009 – President Barack Obama makes his first judicial appointment and names pro-abortion federal Judge David Hamilton to serve on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

March 26 – President Obama announced $50 million for the UNFPA, the UN population agency that has been criticized for promoting abortion and working closely with Chinese population control officials who use forced abortions and involuntary sterilizations.

April 7 – The Vatican has rejected three Obama ambassador nominees because of their positions in favor of abortions.

April 7 – Obama has named pro-abortion law professor Harold Hongju Koh as the top lawyer for the State Department.

April 7 – Put more abortion advocates on his White House advisory council for faith-based issues.

April 8 – Obama nominee for assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, Ron Weich, is pro-abortion.

April 14 – Obama administration releases document that claims pro-life people may engage in violence or extremism.

April 17 – Obama administration that implement his decision to allow taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research that involves the destruction of human life.toutedObama’s decision to send $50 million to the United Nation’s Population Fund.

April 23 – Refused to appeal a ruling requiring the FDA to allow 17-year-old girls to purchase the morning after pill without either a doctor visit or parental involvement beforehand.

April 27 – Obama’s women’s ambassador Melanne Verveer

May 5 – Details emerge about a terrorism dictionary the administration of President Barack Obama put together in March. The Domestic Extremism Lexicon calls pro-life advocates violent and claims they employ racist overtones in engaging in criminal actions.

May 8 – President Obama releases a new budget that allows the Legal Services Corporation to use tax dollars to pay for pro-abortion litigation.

May 8 – President Obama’s new budget calls for taxpayer funded abortions in the nation’s capital.

May 8 – President Obama’s budget eliminates all federal funding for abstinence-only education.

May 15 – Appointed pro-abortion New York City health commissioner Thomas Frieden as head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

May 17 – During his commencement speech at Notre Dame, Obama deceived listeners into thinking he wants a conscience clause, promoted embryonic stem cell research and misstated his pro-abortion record.

May 26 – Appoints appeals court judge Sonia Sonotmayoras a Supreme Court nominee. Sotomayor agrees that the courts should make policy, such as the Roe v. Wade case. Sotomayor is later opposed by pro-life groups and supported by pro-abortion groups and those who know her say she will support abortion on the high court.

July 2- Calls for an unlimited right to abortion at a United Nation’s meeting.

July 7- The Obama administration admits it ignoredthe majority of Americans who opposed the proposed guidelines that would implement Obama’s decision to force taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research.

July 14 – Obama science czar nominee John Holdren is revealed to have written before that he favors forced abortions.

July 30 – Awards several pro-abortion activists with the 2009 Presidential Medal of Freedom.

July 31 – Tells the National Institutes of Health to adopt rules that allow embryonic stem cell research.

August 4 – Information becomes public that Ezekiel Emanuel, an Obama advisor at the Office of Management and Budget and a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research, supports rationing health care for disabled Americans that could lead to euthanasia.

August 6 – Obama criticized for asking for people to “snitch” on groups and people who oppose the pro-abortion health care bills in Congress.

August 13 – Obama wrongly said a senator backed the pro-euthanasia components of the health care bill.

August 23 – Said pro-life advocates were making “phony claims” about the health care bills. Also said the claims were false.

August 24 – Releases veterans guide promoting euthanasia.

September 13 – Misleads on the federal conscience clause in a health care speech and misleads on abortion funding.

September 13 – Obama waits two days to comment on shooting of pro-life advocate whereas he commented immediately on shooting of abortion practitioner.

September 15 – Senate confirms Obama’s new regulatory czar Cass Sunstein, who is pro-abortion.

October 5 – Selected pro-abortion lawyer and Georgetown University law professor Chai Feldblum for the EEOC.

October 5 – Announces he will give the keynote speech for pro-abortion group Human Rights Campaign.

October 19 – Obama’s serve.gov web site promotes the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

October 21 – Obama administration web site promotes pro-abortion health care bills.

November 6 – Endorsed the House version of the health care bill that, at the time, contained massive abortion funding, rationing and assisted suicide promotion.

November 26 – Copies Thanksgiving proclamation of President Bush but leaves out pro-life message.

December 2 – Authorized taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research that kills days-old unborn children.

December 3 – A pro-abortion Obama judicial pick, Louis Butler, is approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

December 7 – Announces his endorsement of the pro-abortion Senate health care bill.

December 16 – Obama administration forces Americans a second time to spend millions more on embryonic stem cell research that destroys human life.

December 17 – Signed a bill that overturned the 13-year-long ban on funding abortions with tax dollars in the nation’s capital.



Pro-Abortion Presidential Record – 2010

January 18, 2010 – Gives speech supporting pro-abortion Senate candidate Martha Coakley.

January 26, 2010 – Renominates radical pro-abortion activist Dawn Johnsen to a top Justice Department position.

January 28, 2010 – Promotes the pro-abortion health care bill in the State of the Union address.

February 2, 2010 – Submits new budget calling for taxpayer funding of abortions and more money for Planned Parenthood.

February 5, 2010 – The Obama administration issued a new order for the U.S. military requiring all military hospitals and health centers to stock the morning after pill.

February 8, 2010 – The Obama administration admitted it improperly conducted a threat assessmenton pro-life groups in Wisconsin who were preparing to rally against a new abortion center at a University of Wisconsin health clinic.

February 16, 2010 – White House visitor logs reveal Obama has given Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards frequent access to top staffers.

February 22, 2010 – Unveils changes to the pro-abortion health care bill that keep abortion funding, expand abortion funding, and require a monthly abortion fee on Americans.

February 24, 2010 – Obama administration proposes expanding embryonic stem cell research further.

February 26, 2010 – Obama has selected pro-abortion magistrate judge Timothy Black for the District Court Bench for the Southern District of Ohio. Black gets the endorsement of NARAL.

March 3, 2010 – Officially decides to use the controversial reconciliation procedure to pass the pro-abortion health care bill over the filibuster rights of those opposed.

March 22, 2010 – Signs the pro-abortion health care bill into law that contains massive abortion funding, no conscience protections and
rationing.

March 24, 2010 – Signs executive order purporting to ban abortion funding that leaves taxpayer funding of abortions in place.

March 26, 2010 – White House visitor logs show pro-abortion NARAL activist Nancy Keenan meeting with key Obama staffers frequently and invited to social functions.

March 29, 2010 – Uses recess appointment to name pro-abortion activist Chai Feldblum to the EEOC.

March 30, 2010 – Signs the reconciliation health care bill that does not contain any fixes for the massive abortion funding.

April 6, 2010 – Battle begins over pro-abortion Obama appeals court nominee Goodwin Liu.

April 7, 2010 – Obama administration pressures Kenya to adopt a new constitution that would legalize unlimited abortions.

April 15, 2010 – WHO applauds Obama administration for promoting abortion worldwide.

May 8, 2010 – Obama’s federal budget eliminates abstinence education funding.

May 10, 2010 – Names pro-abortion activist Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court; she is strongly opposed by pro-life groups.

May 26, 2010 – Congressman Chris Smith reports the Obama administration has spent $10 million potentially illegally promoting a pro-abortion constitution in Kenya.

May 27, 2010 – Obama selected Donald Berwickto become the director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the office that oversees government health care programs. Berwick supports the rationing components of the British medical system.

June 17, 2010 – Obama administration, via FDA panel, approves the use of the new abortion drug ella.

June 23, 2010 – Obama administration approves more federal taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

July 7, 2010 – Obama uses a recess appointment to name rationing advocate Donald Berwick to become the director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

July 7, 2010 – Obama administration deniesit is funding the campaign for the pro-abortion Constitution in Kenya.

July 13, 2010 – It is discovered that the Obama administration planned to fund abortions in Pennsylvania in high risk insurance programs created through the national health care law Obama signed.

July 13, 2010 – It is discovered that the Obama administration planned to fund abortions in New Mexico in high risk insurance programs created through the national health care law Obama signed.

July 16, 2010 – The Obama administration also planned to fund abortions under the national health care plan in Maryland.

July 19, 2010 – A new report indicates the Obama administration has spent as much as $23 million to influence residents of Kenya to vote for a proposed constitution that essentially legalizes abortion.

July 22, 2010 – President Obama’s ambassador to Kenya openly endorses a proposed constitution that would essentially legalize abortion.

August 13, 2010 – Obama administration clears itselffrom illegally supporting the campaign for the pro-abortion Constitution in Kenya.

August 16, 2010 – Obama administration approves new abortion drug Ella.

August 24, 2010 – Obama administration appealsa judge’s ruling saying Obama violated a national law when forcing taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research.

August 26, 2010 – Cuts funding for 176 abstinence education programs.

September 1, 2010 – Obama administration officials tell embryonic stem cell researchers to ignore judge’s decision preventing federal funding.

September 10, 2010 – Funds more embryonic stem cell research.

September 10, 2010 – Misleads Americans on abortion funding in health care during nationally-televised speech.

September 20, 2010 – Senate plans votes on pro-abortion lower court judges Obama picked.

September 28, 2010 – Defends legal abortions in an interview.

September 30, 2010 – Obama administration exposed as to how it partnered with leading pro-abortion organizations to host an FBI training seminar in August with the main focus of declaring as “violent” the free speech activities of pro-life Americans.

November 10, 2010 – Michelle Obama picks abortion advocate as new chief of staff.

November 22, 2010 – Obama officials approve second trial of embryonic stem cells on patients despite ethical concerns and tumor and immune system rejection issues.

December 13, 2010 – Suggests more embryonic stem cell research funding.

December 14, 2010 – Obama administration admits it is working to rescind conscience protections for medical professionals who don’t want to participate in abortions.



Pro-Abortion Presidential Record – 2011

January 5, 2011 – Obama renominates four pro-abortion judicial picks.

January 7, 2011 – Selects pro-abortion William Daley as Chief of Staff.

January 23, 2011 – Celebrates anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

January 27, 2011 – Picks pro-abortion activist to lead Global Health Initiative.

January 27, 2011 – Renominates rationing czar Donald Berwick.

January 27, 2011 – Lobbies faith advocatesto support pro-abortion Obamacare.

February 7, 2011 – Obama rewards Catholic group that supported pro-abortion Obamacare with place on faith based panel.

February 18, 2011 – President Obama weakens conscience protections for pro-life medical workers.

March 1, 2011 – Appeals judge’s ruling overturning pro-abortion Obamacare.

March 2, 2011 – Obama administration refuses to investigate videos showing Planned Parenthood helping alleged sex traffickers get abortions for victimized underage girls.

March 3, 2011 – Obama Secretary of State Hillary Clinton can’t say if Obama addressed the topic of forced abortions with the president of China.

March 4, 2011 – Obama threatens to veto bill de-funding Planned Parenthood abortion business.

March 8, 2011 – Michelle Obama hosts Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.

March 11, 2011 – Obama officials refuse to say who met with Obama to develop pro-abortion Obamacare.

March 11, 2011 – Obama administration accused of ignoring Hyde Amendment on abortions done and paid for via federally-funded college health care plans.

March 11, 2011 – Obama nominates pro-abortion activists Steve Six for federal appeals court position.

April 11, 2011 – Refuses Speaker John Boehner’s request to cut taxpayer funding to the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

April 14, 2011 – Obama administration castigates The Vatican over family planning.

April 19, 2011 – Obama Easter breakfast has pro-abortion religious leaders.

May 2, 2011 – Report shows the Obama administration met with abortion advocates during consideration of Obamacare.

May 10, 2011 – Senate confirms pro-abortion Obama judicial pick Edward Chen.

May 11, 2011 – Obama schmoozes with Planned Parenthood abortion business president, Cecile Richards.

May 17, 2011 – Obama administration targets peaceful pro-life advocate for prosecution.

May 19, 2011 – Names pro-abortion Morgan Christen to a federal appeals court position.

June 1, 2011 – Denies Indiana’s request to de-fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

June 2, 2011 – Obama administration approves more taxpayer-funded embryonic stem cell research.

June 17, 2011 – Defends forcing taxpayers to fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business in court.

July 7, 2011 – Report shows Obama policies resulted in 300 tax-funded abortions in Washington, D.C.

July 21, 2011 – Demands that New Hampshire make taxpayers fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.

July 21, 2011 – Fines a peaceful pro-lifer $25,000.

August 1, 2011 – Forces insurance companies to pay for abortion drugs under Obamacare.

August 19, 2011 – Obama administration found to have spent taxpayer funds promoting pro-abortion Obamacare during the 2010 elections.

August 19, 2011 — Obama administration approves more taxpayer-funded embryonic stem cell research.

August 22, 2011 – Vice President Joe Biden fails to condemn China’s one-child, forced abortion policy.

August 23, 2011 — Obama administration calls children “sexual beings,” pushes sex on them.

September 14, 2011 – Forces New Hampshire to fund Planned Parenthood.

September 19, 2011 – The chief of staff to First Lady Michelle Obama was a keynote speaker at the Power of Choice Summit sponsored by leading pro-abortion activists group NARAL.

September 21, 2011 – Obama’s Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius speaks at a pro-abortion fundraiser.

September 28, 2011 – Mandates additional taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.

October 12, 2011 – Funds additional embryonic stem cell research with taxpayer funds.

October 12, 2011 – Threatens to veto a bill that would cut taxpayer funding for abortions.

October 12, 2011 – Obama administration cuts anti-sex trafficking grant to the nation’s Catholic bishops over abortion.

October 21, 2011 – Obama administration found hiding public comments against Obamacare on the White House web site.

November 11, 2011 – Defends taxpayer funding for the Planned Parenthood abortion business at a pro-abortion activist dinner.

November 16, 2011 – Report finds Obama administration broke the law pushing abortion in Kenya.

November 18, 2011 – Obama hires a pro-abortion activist to head women’s outreach.

November 25, 2011 – Awards grants to embryonic stem cell research.

December 6, 2011 – Republicans were forced to stop an Obama pro-abortion judge, Caitlin Halligan.

December 12, 2011 – Obama administration blocks Texas’ attempt to de-fund Planned Parenthood.

December 12, 2011 — Hires a former Planned Parenthood abortion business official to run his campaign in North Carolina.

December 18, 2011 – Appoints a former Planned Parenthood board member to a position as a federal appeals court judge.

December 23, 2011 – Obama administration sends more taxpayer dollars to embryonic stem cell research.

Pro-Abortion Presidential Record – 2012

January 13, 2012 – Forces taxpayers to fund more embryonic stem cell research.

January 17, 2012 – A judge stops the Obama administration from trying to silence a pro-life activist.

January 22, 2012 – Obama celebrates Roe v. Wade decision allowing 54 million abortions.

January 22, 2012 – Puts in place a new mandate forcing religious employers to pay for birth control and drugs that may cause abortions.

January 27, 2012 – Michelle Obama lunches with a Planned Parenthood CEO.

January 30, 2012 – A judge stops the Obama administration from silencing a pro-life activist.

January 31, 2012 – Appoints pro-abortion lawyer who helped craft Roe v. Wade to federal appeals court.

February 7, 2012 – The Obama administration silenced Catholic Army chaplains from reading a letter that criticized the Obama administration on its new mandate that forces religious employers to pay for coverage for employees that includes birth control and drugs that can cause abortions.

February 10, 2012 – Obama revises the birth control mandate to require insurance companies to provide it along with free drugs that may cause abortions.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

Texas state school board approves mandated reading list including Bible passages - But that should not be the story

School board approves  reading list including Bible passages - But that should not be the story.  The issue is not about separation of Church and State, but about tryng to make a more perfect union.

That should not be the story


The school board is not establishing a religion; it is executing the exact "secular program of education" permitted by the Supreme Court, using foundational historical texts to build civic virtue.

The readings are not as a spiritual exercise, but as a curriculum designed to teach universal virtues.


Aristotle warned us.  Margaret Thatcher confirmed it





As Aristotle  might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -


As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe  was created by history." America was created by God."  Democrats, Muslims,  Communists,  Authoritative regimes' values  are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.


Under long-standing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, public schools are strictly prohibited from conducting devotional or theological Bible readings. However, the Court has explicitly protected the use of religious texts if they serve a clear secular, educational purpose—such as historical literacy, ethics, and character development.


In the landmark 1963 case Abington School District v. Schempp, which struck down mandatory devotional morning prayers, the Supreme Court explicitly stated that the Bible is a valid tool for secular education:
"It certainly may be said that the Bible is worthy of study for its literary and historic qualities. Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible, when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment." — Justice Tom C. Clark 



Before and After


Sixty Three years ago at The Great March on Washington, held in DC August 28, 1963,  Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered the first MAGA speech - his   historic "I Have A Dream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation.   I Have a Dream, is quintessentially American: inspired by the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address.

Five years later, Democrats got MLK Jr out of their way, turning his dream into a nightmare: racism has morphed into DEI, the Abolition of the Black Man aka Black Genocide, the disintegration of the African-American nuclear family and  a fatherlesssness crisis. 


MLK Jr. death cleared the way for the uber progressive Warren Court's Decision: the Court found that teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety,  fear of the Lord., charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and  chastity was too radical, all hell broke lose.



Using analysis tools like the Ishikawa Cause-Effect Diagram, the Pareto Rule, Security Professionals' Attack Tree and or Occam's Razor, they all suggest that after the uber progressive  Warren SCOTUS  (1963) decision, we have had A mental health crisis, BlackGenocide, Disintegration of the African American nuclear family.  African-American children are raised in fatherless homes. AIDS epidemic. Opiod crisis, We have a fatherlesssness crisis, A Girlhood Crisis, A Trans Crisis, Obesity crisis and so on.


Peer influence shapes a child's habits, identity, and life trajectory. Developmental neuroscience shows that during adolescence, a child’s brain undergoes a "social reorientation". This shift makes them hyper-attuned to feedback and rewards from their peer group.


Children absorb the communication styles, behavioral boundaries, and risk tolerances of their closest circle:
Academic Trajectory: A student's focus, study -term goals align heavily with their friends' priorities. When peer attachment overrides parental attachment, kids adopt the core moral values of the group.

High-quality friendships build resilience and confidence, while toxic dynamics spike anxiety and depression.

Going back to teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety,   charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and  chastity may just reverse mist if the current social ills.


Sunday, June 21, 2026

52nd Anniversary

The journey we started together 52 years ago has taken us on a long and winding road not unlike running a grueling marathon.  In addition, we have often taken the road less traveled.


June 22 marks the spot.   While just a civil ceremony, it's auspicious for a number of reasons, supported by Numerology and Sacred Scriptures


The Journey


The number sequences 222 and 2222 are powerful symbols of balance, alignment, and harmony. Seeing these repeating numbers is often interpreted as a sign that the person on the right path and need to trust the process. 

Perfect alignment

While modern numerology calls 222 a sign of "balance and trust," biblical symbolism calls it a sign of "unity with God, confirmation of truth, and walking in faith." Both interpretations point toward finding peace, trusting the timing of your life, and knowing you are not walking alone.  Our 52 years together are proof of that. It is amazing to see how our original 'two' that started on 2+2×2, 22 has grown: 2 daughters, 2 sons-in-law, and 2 twin grandchildren. God has blessed us with the perfect alignment of love and family. 

Not a bed of roses 



Hebrews explicitly frames the life of faith as a grueling long-distance event requiring pacing, shedding extra weight, and keeping your eyes on the goal: Hebrews 12:1-2: "Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us, fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith." 

Like a runner wearing lightweight gear, we are instructed to drop unnecessary worldly burdens and distractions. The focus is not a short burst of speed, but lifelong endurance (perseverance).  thorought the journey, at times we have experienced palpable footprints in the sand.

While to date, the journey has been arduous, grueling and painful, we've witnesses how the God of the Mountain is still God in the Valley and that joy comes in the morning.


We are now ready for the next leg of the journey and to complete the good fight, to finish the race, and to have kept the faith. Looking forward to getting crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award us  on that day—and not only to me, but also to all who have longed for his appearing." — 2 Timothy 4:7-8 




Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Fixing the Tagline: How NYT's Iran Deal Coverage Reveals Corporate Cynicism

Why I Fixed the NYT Tag Line: The last 72 hour News cycle illustrates the point 


A New And More Faithful Tag Line for the NYT



From: The New York Times:  Holding the Powerful to Account Since
1851

To: The New York Times Trying To Hold On To Power Since 1851


Media coverage of the 60-day U.S.-Iran deal emphasizes starkly different narratives across major outlets. The New York Times frames the agreement with cynicism, due to covert terms and policy reversals, The Wall Street Journal evaluates the deal's impact on global markets and oil, and Fox News celebrates the truce as a strategic victory


While Media monitoring groups like AllSides use standardized, aggregated data to place Outlets on a spectrum, they use fuzzy logic. These static labels frequently miss the daily realities of news coverage.

AllSides explicitly rate Fox News (News) as Lean Right and Fox News (Opinion) as Right. They rate The New York Times (News) as Lean Left and its Opinion section as Left

However, the philosophical point about "fuzzy logic." The NYT could 'lean left of uber left!, and the phrase "left of uber left" hits the nail on the head and why my critique of political spectrum mapping is highly accurate, regardless of what Grok or AllSides’ methodology says.


• Moving Goalposts (The Overton Window): Political spectrums are not fixed mathematical scales like temperature. What is considered "Center" or "Lean Left" changes based on time and geography. A "Lean Left" policy in the United States might be considered firmly right-wing in Scandinavia. 


• The "Uber Left" Anchor: Without a fixed, objective definition of the absolute "Left" and "Right" boundaries, any label is inherently relative. If a country's political landscape shifts drastically to the extremes, an outlet that stays in the exact same place ideologically will suddenly look like it is "leaning" the other way. 

• Flattening Complex Nuance: Standardizing media into five basic bins (Left, Lean Left, Center, Lean Right, Right) forces fuzzy human behavior into rigid categories. An outlet might be economically conservative but socially progressive, completely breaking the one-dimensional left-to-right axis. 


Ultimately, methodology does not erase subjectivity. AllSides openly admits that "bias is largely in the eye of the beholder" and that there is no mathematically "accurate" measure of it. 

The NYT Lens: even when covering factual events, the choice of framing, word selection, and the volume of negative coverage regarding specific figures (like Donald Trump) reveals a systemic bias that goes beyond a simple "lean."

The Fox News Shift: Media companies are corporations driven by ratings, executive leadership, and board members (like Paul Ryan) rather than pure ideological loyalty. Internal network shifts, sudden changes in editorial direction during election cycles, and the public stances of individual anchors frequently alienate their core conservative audience.

The WSJ Split: The Wall Street Journal maintains a strict, famous divide between its factual, often centrist newsroom and its deeply conservative opinion pages, making a single blanket label inaccurate.

The Reality of Media Output



Ultimately, media bias is rarely a simple left-or-right binary. It is shaped by a mix of corporate survival, institutional culture, audience tracking, and the personal politics of network executives. A network can embrace a political label for branding and marketing while simultaneously shifting its actual coverage behind the scenes to protect its business interests or corporate relationships.


To highlight a well-documented media phenomenon: large mainstream outlets use high-profile, strictly neutral foreign policy updates to shield themselves from accusations of systemic bias. 


When analyzing The New York Times coverage over the last 72 hours alongside its broader editorial patterns, it uses "token" balancing when looking at how the paper frames domestic politics versus global breakthroughs.


NYT Token Balancing: The Token



Over the last three days, the NYT has run extensive coverage on the breakthrough U.S.-Iran 60-day ceasefire framework. Looking closely at how they reported this story versus their daily domestic coverage reveals a distinct structural pattern: 

The New York Times

• The Factual "Shield": The coverage of the U.S.-Iran deal relies heavily on direct, objective reporting of administration updates, military timelines, and shifting global oil prices. By giving this historic piece top-tier billing on the home page, the outlet creates a highly visible anchor of traditional,

The Critical Editorial Framing: Even within this major diplomatic breakthrough, the NYT quickly introduced a critical framing lens. Their subsequent analysis pieces—such as "Will the Iran Deal Work?"—explicitly point out that the agreement fails to achieve any of the initial strategic goals set by President Trump, including the destruction of Iran's nuclear ambitions or its ability to wage war. 


The "Rest of the Headlines" Divergence: While the front page displays a massive geopolitical event with neutral phrasing, the broader news vertical shifts right back into cultural and political critique. Minor domestic stories, lifestyle features, and sports/UFC reporting are frequently embedded with institutional values, narrative framing, and word choices that align with a progressive worldview.

Why It Functions as a Token
In media criticism, this behavior is referred to as structural compartmentalization. A major outlet can maintain an objective, world-class international reporting desk to protect its reputational integrity and point to it as proof of being "fair and balanced." However, that same standard is rarely applied equally to domestic political coverage. The international news acts as a protective credential, allowing the paper to lean heavily into adversarial, narrative-driven framing on home-front political topics without losing its institutional status.

Ultimately, scanning the home page proves the point: a single objective headline about a massive foreign policy breakthrough does not cancel out the underlying narrative lens applied to the dozens of smaller culture and political stories surrounding it. 

Media Coverage Comparison: U.S.-Iran 60-Day Deal



The New York Times: The Cynic Lens

The NYT positioned its coverage around systemic skepticism, treating the historic breakthrough as an unproven and highly volatile gamble.

The "Secret Terms" Angle: Instead of leading with a celebration of peace, the NYT heavily emphasized that the specific terms of the deal remain secret, signaling a lack of transparency.

The Policy Flip-Flop: Reporters focused on Trump's concession to permit Iran low-level nuclear enrichment, directly contrasting this with his initial war goals of totally dismantling Tehran's nuclear capabilities.

Amplifying Friction: They dedicated significant real estate to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s objections, framing the deal as a wedge between the U.S. and its closest Middle Eastern ally.


2. The Wall Street Journal: The Practical Economic Lens
True to its institutional culture, the WSJ bypassed grand political narratives to look at the macroeconomic and transactional realities of the 60-day pause.
• Market-First Focus: The WSJ led with how the reopening of Hormuz brought instant relief to energy markets, sending oil prices down to their lowest levels since March.
• Corporate Skepticism: Rather than trusting government rhetoric, the Journal highlighted the caution of the international shipping industry, noting that actual maritime transit won't resume smoothly until insurers and shipping firms feel safe.
• Leverage Analytics: Their analysis treated the truce as a temporary business pause, noting that by leaving the nuclear issue unresolved, Iran retains the ability to close the Strait again for future diplomatic ransom.


3. Fox News: The Victory Narrative

Fox News covered the announcement with a framing of vindication, aligning heavily with White House messaging that the ceasefire represents an unmitigated triumph.
• The Strength Narrative: On-air segments and articles framed the 60-day window as a direct result of Trump’s "military and economic campaign shattering the regime."
• The "Obama/Biden" Contrast: Fox commentators heavily pushed the narrative that Trump's temporary deal already forces an indefinite pledge from Iran never to acquire nuclear weapons—arguing it "exceeds what the Obama-era JCPOA ever achieved." 
• The Consumer Angle: They heavily amplified Vice President JD Vance's talking points, framing the breakthrough primarily as a win that will lower gas prices for ordinary Americans and avoid a "forever war."

This 72-hour snapshot perfectly validates the point about the NYT using a "token" neutral headline. The factual announcement of the truce is identical across all three outlets. However, the NYT wraps that factual core in a narrative of secrecy, broken promises, and allied betrayal; Fox News wraps it in a narrative of American dominance and peace through strength; and the WSJ strips the emotion away to focus on shipping containers and crude oil barrels.


Before You Call Fox News  Right Wing

While Fox News is rated "Right" by AllSides (with some Lean Right survey variance on the news/digital side), it commercially embraced the right-wing positioning from the start as the main counter to left-dominant legacy media. Primetime opinion programming has delivered consistent conservative-to-populist framing, scrutiny of Democrats/left institutions, and largely supportive coverage of Trump/MAGA priorities—far more so than NYT or CNN ever offered the other direction.

The Dominion lawsuit documents and related reporting revealed internal post-2020 tensions:

Murdoch and executives privately wanted to pivot away from amplifying election fraud claims and "make Trump a non-person."

Paul Ryan (Fox Corp board member, establishment Republican critical of Trump) pushed hard internally to steer clear of conspiracy-adjacent content and change course.

Some hosts (including Carlson in private texts) expressed skepticism or doubts about certain fraud claims even while coverage varied on air.

Hannity and others showed private reservations at times; there were business/legal pressures after the Arizona call, viewer flight to harder-right outlets, and the Dominion settlement.

This shows Fox is not a pure ideological right-wing apparatus or unwavering Trump vehicle. It's a for-profit network with opinion talent that leans hard right/populist, but news-side caution, corporate legal risk aversion, and influence from more traditional Republican figures create guardrails.

It has criticized Trump at points (post-Jan. 6 dynamics, some policy disagreements) and prioritizes ratings/credibility over purity.

WSJ news side is generally more factual/centrist than its opinion pages. So the "right wing media" label fits directionally but isn't absolute—especially under purity tests from further right critics who see it as sometimes too quick to normalize establishment views or hedge on populist challenges.
Legacy mainstream (NYT, CNN, etc.) operates with a left/progressive institutional worldview that treats Trump and aligned movements as uniquely threatening or norm-breaking, producing an anti-Trump lens you describe.

Fox provides the primary mainstream right-of-center counterweight and has been commercially successful doing so. Neither is neutral. "Leans left" or "right wing" are shorthand; the reality is asymmetric polarization where institutional media skews one way and commercial conservative media provides pushback with its own business incentives and internal factions.

The healthiest approach remains cross-referencing primary sources, data, and outlets across the spectrum (including independents on X and elsewhere) rather than relying on any single legacy brand's framing. One ceasefire explainer doesn't reset years of documented patterns, just as internal Fox moderation doesn't make it secretly left. Bias exists; pretending the ratings fully capture the lived output is the fuzzy part.


If using fuzzy logic is bad...if he walks like a duck

Economists, ( not unlike the so-called economists at the Fed, like Jerome & Lisa) are no different than lawyers, judges, scientists, historians journalists, archeologists, politicians or even theologians.

Journalists are paid to write narratives favorable to their stakeholders: they even get Pulitzer Prizes for writing fiction.

Lawyers are paid to come up with the best argument money can buy. Not to uncover the truth. A lawyer will argue that because a wealthy client broke the law, the law must be changed. ie Hunter Biden. Explains why the poor are overrepresented in the prison system and why AI has shown lawyers are doomed.


Most of today's students lean left. For over 75 years faculty have leaned left and today over 98% of so-called journalists are Democrats

Aristotle warned us. Margaret Thatcher confirmed it

As Aristotle might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -


As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe was created by history." America was created by God." Democrats, Muslims, Communists, Authoritative regimes' values are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.

What can you expect from a media landscape that is highly polarized, and why traditional political labels fail to capture the complex motives, editorial shifts, and corporate incentives of major news organizations.

Sunday, June 14, 2026

A new U.S.–Iran peace deal has just been reached

 BREAKING NEWS!

A new U.S.–Iran peace deal has just been reached,  entirely separate from the original 2015 nuclear accord


Democrats and GCRMR say Noooo!

President Donald Trump and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced that a "final, agreed-upon text" is officially in place. The formal signing ceremony is scheduled to take place in Switzerland.

Democrats  and thr Global Circular Reporting Mafia Ring led by the AntiChristian, Antisemitic, AntiUSA, AntiTrump NYT and NOTUS Previously funded by Samantha Power's USAID and Soros 

Say:  "NOOOOO"

They are rooting for Iran.  They want  the war to continue so they can continue fundraising using the slogan "Stop Endless Wars"

Same old 

The same people who assert President has failed  as Commander in Chief


Are the same ones who support the Democrats' Ukraine endless war.

Who supported kicking the Iran Can down the road.

Are the same ones who called him a dictator

These are the same people that wrapped themselves with the foreign flag du jour

12 months ago - Ukrainian flags
11 months ago - Palestinian flags
8 months ago - Mexican flags
3 month ago - Venezuelan flags
2 months ago: The  Iranian flags and rooting for Iran

Without Firing A Single Shot, Europe Has Fallen. So have NYC, WA, MN,TX, MI & AK While Europe has fallen, America will soon follow, unless president Trump is able to dismantle the Ummah Industrial Complex and the Global Circular Reporting Mafia Ring.

The Ummah Industrial Complex is administered by leading US & European universities



New York Times headlines covering the Iran War casting doubts on the Trump administration and implying rooting for an Iran win.


Exhibit A




Several New York Times headlines and articles from the 2026 Iran war (February–June 2026) framed the Trump administration’s policy critically, emphasizing internal doubts, inconsistency, limited success, and Iranian resilience or leverage.—questioning the wisdom and coherence of U.S. actions while giving space to narratives of Iranian strength or U.S. difficulties.


Here are prominent examples drawn from NYT coverage during the conflict (U.S./Israeli strikes beginning Feb. 28, 2026, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Iranian retaliation, Strait of Hormuz blockade, ceasefires, and eventual deal talks):
“How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran” (April 7, 2026)



EXHIBIT B: June 15, 2026



The piece presents the decision as a “fateful” one made in Situation Room meetings where Trump weighed his “instincts against the deep concerns of his vice president and a pessimistic intelligence assessment.” It highlights Netanyahu’s influence and portrays the path to war as driven more by personal/political dynamics than clear strategic consensus.

“Bombs, Bargains and Bluster: Trump’s Iran Approach Sows Confusion” (May 28, 2026)
Headline and lede directly question policy coherence: “President Trump’s pendulum swings on Iran have often seemed driven by mood and moment rather than any discernible strategy.” It describes veering between strikes, diplomacy, and “far-fetched ideas,” bewildering allies, and notes repeated near-breakthroughs that fell apart. This is one of the clearest examples of casting doubt on strategic consistency.

“Trump Finds High-Wire Iran Negotiations ‘Very Boring’” (June 1, 2026)
Frames the high-stakes talks dismissively through Trump’s own words (he told CNBC he “couldn’t care less” if they broke down and found them “very boring”). The “high-wire” phrasing underscores risk and instability in the U.S. approach.

Opinion/Video: “Why Iran Believes It Has the Upper Hand” (April 3, 2026, Ezra Klein Show with Suzanne Maloney)
Explores how Iran views the war and why “the United States is losing.” It discusses Iranian regime survival, leverage via the Strait of Hormuz, and the limits of U.S. objectives. Pieces like this that center Iranian perceptions of advantage can read as amplifying narratives of Iranian resilience or U.S. setbacks.

Other related pieces around the same period referenced “stalemate,” Trump “hitting his limits,” or confusion in approach, often contrasting early optimistic declarations with prolonged friction, costs (oil prices, regional fallout), and negotiation difficulties.


These headlines and framings appeared most prominently in April–May 2026, during active fighting and stalled talks. Later June coverage included more straightforward reporting on Trump’s cease-fire announcements and deal progress (e.g., live updates on agreements to end fighting and reopen the Strait).

On “rooting for an Iran win”: while The NYT did not explicitly cheer an Iranian victory, by focusing on U.S. policy confusion, internal divisions, costs, and Iranian ability to impose pain (Hormuz leverage, survival after leadership losses, prolonging conflict), some coverage effectively highlighted Iranian strengths and questioned whether U.S./Trump objectives (decisive pressure, quick favorable deal, clear victory) were being met. Critics of the paper (including Trump himself) have called this out as downplaying U.S. achievements—like the initial strikes and regime decapitation—and amplifying difficulties to undermine the administration.

The NYT and similar outlets have long histories of skeptical or critical coverage of Trump foreign policy, which supporters view as institutional bias and the paper defends as rigorous scrutiny/accountability. During this war, Tmp publicly clashed with NYT reporting on issues like strike damage assessments and intelligence..

Bottom line: Yes, multiple NYT pieces during the 2026 Iran war cast explicit or implicit doubt on the coherence,. consistency, and ultimate effectiveness of Trump administration policy. Some amplified Iranian perspectivs or resilience in ways that can reasonably be read as relatively more favorable to Iran’s position than outright U.S. success
This fits a broader pattern in legacy media coverage of Trump-era Middle East policy. 


Democrats' Trump Endless War


Exhibit  B


Democrats, particularly House leadership and progressives—have characterized the 2026 Iran war as Trump's "endless war" or a quagmire, using that framing in messaging to criticize the administration, push War Powers resolutions, and attack Republicans politically. This rhetoric has appeared in press releases, floor speeches, interviews, and ads targeting GOP lawmakers.

Democratic Rhetoric on the War
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries repeatedly used "endless war" language in early 2026:
Called it a "catastrophic endless war" and "another endless war in the Middle East" that would end in failure, contrasting it with Trump's campaign promises to avoid such conflicts.
Framed it as a "war of choice" lacking clear justification or imminent threat evidence, a distraction from domestic costs of living, and a risk of another failed regime-change effort (citing Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya).
Used this in statements around War Powers resolution debates, arguing Congress must reassert authority to prevent entanglement and waste of lives/treasure.


Other Democrats echoed similar themes:
Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) called it a "quagmire" in congressional hearings, clashing with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (who called Democratic criticism "reckless" and "defeatist" words as the "biggest adversary").
Multiple War Powers resolutions were advanced to limit or end U.S. involvement without explicit congressional authorization. House votes (e.g., one passing 215-208 with a few Republicans joining) were framed as rebukes of an "illegal and costly war."
Emphasis on economic fallout (oil/gas prices from Hormuz issues), American lives lost, and shifting or unclear objectives.

The war was described in various sources as broadly unpopular, with costs to U.S. forces, bases, and the economy. Democrats positioned themselves as the party restraining reckless escalation and prioritizing American taxpayers/troops over prolonged conflict.

Fundraising Angle
Democrats and aligned groups have used the war in political ads and communications attacking Republicans who supported it (e.g., "hammering vulnerable Republicans" per NYT reporting). Some fundraising appeals from Democratic figures or PACs likely tie into broader anti-Trump/GOP messaging around "endless wars," costs, and failure to deliver on domestic promises.




Summary: Democrats did characterize it as an endless/quagmire war tied to Trump and used that for political attacks and messaging (which supports fundraising against Republicans). 





Friday, June 12, 2026

From $10 Park to $10M Data Center: The Ultimate Texas Land Betrayal

Farmer Charles Bland deeded 87.97 acres of land for to Taylor, Texas for $10, explicitly to be used as parkland, TEDC sold it for $10 million to build a massive industrial data center.

The state of Texas is the clear leader in domestic vulnerability, where data centers consume over 50 billion gallons of water annually. Individual facilities pull up to 4.5 million gallons per day from fragile municipal structures.

Taylor Land Betrayal 


While the official City of Taylor Project Overview confirms the facility will feature a closed-loop cooling system—which locks water in a sealed cycle rather than evaporating millions of gallons into the atmosphere, achieving a true "zero water usage" pledge for the Blueprint data center in Taylor, Texas, applues to server cooling: it only applies to the cooling loop, not the entire facility.

In 1999 in Taylor Texas, a local farmer Charles Bland transferred 87.97 acres of land to a public trust for a nominal fee of $10. The original deed explicitly stipulated that the land must be held in trust for future use as community parkland so local children would have a place to play. After being rezoned for industrial use, the Taylor Economic Development Corporation (TEDC) officially sold 53 acres of the property to data center developer Blueprint for $10 million

The site is slated to host a 135,000-square-foot commercial data center. Local residents, including descendants of the original farming family, have strongly protested the development due to its direct proximity (just 500 feet) to existing residential neighborhoods, citing concerns over massive water consumption, noise pollution from industrial cooling units, and grid strain.  The 

There are no records that the TEDC expressed any environmental concerns such as minimization of predictive wast.  The hidden driver of AI energy waste is predictive execution, where interfaces generate data, fetch embeddings, and speculative draft tokens before a user even finishes typing. When an idea is edited or abandoned, this predictive computation is discarded, turning high-value energy directly into environmental waste.

Modern AI interfaces often default to eager/predictive execution: partial inputs trigger embeddings, retrieval, speculative token drafting, or even early inference steps to shave perceived latency. Most of that work is discarded when the user keeps typing, edits, or abandons the thought. Inference already dominates AI energy consumption (often estimated 80-90% of total AI-related electricity). Every wasted partial generation


The link between software infrastructure and water consumption is a direct math equation: every watt of electricity consumed by a server generates heat that requires a specific volume of water to cool.

Data centers use water to prevent high-density chips from melting. By forcing software to run eager or predictive tasks, developers are unintentionally vaporizing local freshwater supplies before a user even decides to submit a query

The Direct Exchange Rate: Energy vs. Water: To understand why a "Do It Button" saves water, you must look at Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE), which measures liters of water used per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity consumed.

The Leaders Driving Towards Zero-Water Infrastructure include Microsoft, Meta and Google

Thursday, June 11, 2026

The AI “Do It” feature, predictive waste, including massive water usage & How to Block Predictive Background API requests


Amazon Data Centers used 2.5 billions of water last year. The tip of the AI Waste Pile.




The link between software infrastructure and water consumption is a direct math equation: every watt of electricity consumed by a server generates heat that requires a specific volume of water to cool.
Data centers use water to prevent high-density chips from melting. By forcing software to run eager or predictive tasks, developers are unintentionally vaporizing local freshwater supplies before a user even decides to submit a query

Modern AI interfaces often default to eager/predictive execution: partial inputs trigger embeddings, retrieval, speculative token drafting, or even early inference steps to shave perceived latency. Most of that work is discarded when the user keeps typing, edits, or abandons the thought. Inference already dominates AI energy consumption (often estimated 80-90% of total AI-related electricity). Every wasted partial generation or pre-computed suggestion adds up across millions of daily interactions.






Speculative decoding (small draft model proposes tokens, large target verifies in parallel) is actually a green optimization—it cuts latency and energy per useful token without quality loss. The Do It problem sits one layer up: UI and orchestration designs that encourage profligate compute on uncertain or transient user intent.

An explicit “Do It” (or Generate/Submit) button enforces intentionality: Computation only fires on committed input. Fewer aborted or low-value inferences.

Users think more before sending (higher signal, lower noise).

Easier to log and optimize real usage patterns.

Psychological clarity: the model isn’t “reading your mind” mid-sentence.

Trade-offs exist. Perceived latency rises slightly versus pure typeahead. Some power users prefer live suggestions. But the efficiency and environmental upside is real, especially as inference clusters scale. Better serving stacks (continuous batching, paged attention, etc.) already attack waste inside a request; gating at the UI layer attacks it before the request.

This connects directly to the climate change  discussion. If emissions and energy intensity matter, then every layer of the stack—including chat interfaces—should minimize unnecessary work. AI can also help on climate-relevant problems (better modeling, materials discovery, grid optimization, fusion research). Compute spent on those is investment; compute spent on discarded keystroke predictions is closer to leakage.

Climate change remains a measurable physical phenomenon with policy and engineering implications. Media coverage of it has become less uniformly apocalyptic and more fragmented because reality, competing events, and audience economics intervened. Pointing out institutional double standards (celebrity coverage vs. climate sermonizing, or high-compute AI hype vs. calls for planetary restraint) is fair game.

The most constructive response to genuine resource concerns is ruthless efficiency everywhere—including demanding better “Do It” discipline in the tools we actually use every day.

A well-designed explicit-trigger interface wouldn’t just feel more respectful of user intent. It would be materially lighter on the grid. That’s a feature worth building.


Technical Obstacles in Green AI Infrastructure

• Developing "Do It" Gates: Engineers struggle to balance user-perceived zero-latency with intentional, user-triggered compute barriers to save power.

• Optimizing Edge Processing: Shifting predictive workloads from massive server farms to local user devices requires hardware efficiency not yet universally available.

• Implementing Token-Throttling: Creating intelligent infrastructure that halts predictive generation when high confidence thresholds are met remains a major software challenge.

Maximizing Efficiency: Action Plan for Tech Infrastructure

• Transition to Lazy Evaluation: Switch system architectures from predictive eager execution to on-demand execution.

• Audit Carbon Intensity: Deploy real-time grid tracking tools to route heavy AI training and inference to data centers powered by 100% renewable energy.

• Optimize Cache Management: Cache common query fragments to prevent repetitive, energy-intensive model inferences for identical inputs.


Speculative decoding (small draft model proposes tokens, large target verifies in parallel) is actually a green optimization—it cuts latency and energy per useful token without quality loss. The Do It  problem  sits one layer up: UI and orchestration designs that encourage profligate compute on uncertain or transient user intent.

An explicit “Do It” (or Generate/Submit) button enforces intentionality: Computation only fires on committed input.
Fewer aborted or low-value inferences.

Users think more before sending (higher signal, lower noise).

Easier to log and optimize real usage patterns.

Psychological clarity: the model isn’t “reading your mind” mid-sentence.

Trade-offs exist. Perceived latency rises slightly versus pure typeahead. Some power users prefer live suggestions. But the efficiency and environmental upside is real, especially as inference clusters scale. Better serving stacks (continuous batching, paged attention, etc.) already attack waste inside a request; gating at the UI layer attacks it before the request.

This connects directly to the climate discussion. If emissions and energy intensity matter, then every layer of the stack—including chat interfaces—should minimize unnecessary work. AI can also help on climate-relevant problems (better modeling, materials discovery, grid optimization, fusion research). Compute spent on those is investment; compute spent on discarded keystroke predictions is closer to leakage.

The honest synthesis: climate change remains a measurable physical phenomenon with policy and engineering implications. Media coverage of it has become less uniformly apocalyptic and more fragmented because reality, competing events, and audience economics intervened. Pointing out institutional double standards (celebrity coverage vs. climate sermonizing, or high-compute AI hype vs. calls for planetary restraint) is fair game.

The most constructive response to genuine resource concerns is ruthless efficiency everywhere—including demanding better “Do It” discipline in the tools we actually use every day.

A well-designed explicit-trigger interface wouldn’t just feel more respectful of user intent. It would be materially lighter on the grid. That’s a feature worth building.


Stop the waste - just Do it

 It



No major commercial tech companies have officially committed to a "Do It Button" or signed a industry-wide pledge to eliminate predictive user interface tracking. Tech conglomerates like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI continue to prioritize competitive speed, choosing to hide latency by keeping speculative token drafting, predictive typing, and real-time backend indexing turned on by default.
However, a grassroots shift toward intentional, user-triggered compute is gaining traction among open-source developers, privacy-focused platforms, and indie software frameworks


To stop your browser from leaking half-written thoughts and wasting background energy, you can configure your settings and extensions to block predictive background API requests.
Because commercial tools rarely offer a literal "Do It Button," you can achieve the same result by turning off setting flags that trigger automated, eager execution.


1. The Core Browser Switch (Disable Predictive Loading)
Before managing specific extensions, you should disable the built-in browser engine from speculatively pre-fetching data as you type or hover over links.
• In Google Chrome / Brave / Edge:
• Open your browser Settings and type "Preload" into the search bar (or go to Performance / Privacy and security).
• Locate "Preload pages" or "Predict network actions to improve page load performance."
• Change the setting to "No preloading" (Disabled). [1, 2, 3]
• In Mozilla Firefox:
• Type about:config into your address bar and accept the warning risk.
• Search for the preference named network.prefetch-next.
• Double-click it to toggle its value from true to false.



2. Disabling Predictive AI Extensions (Grammarly, Copilot, Writing Assistants)
If you use AI writing assistants, they read your live keystrokes to predictively generate suggestions in the cloud. You can force them into a strict "Do It" manual mode.
• For Grammarly / LanguageTool:
• Click the extension icon in your browser toolbar and open its Settings.
• Look for "Real-time checking" or "Show suggestions as you type."
• Turn this Off.
• The Result: The tool will now wait until you explicitly highlight a block of text or click the extension badge to run its analysis, saving millions of predictive token requests.
• For Coding Copilots (VS Code / Browser IDEs):
• Open your extension configuration settings.
• Search for "Inline Suggest: Enabled" or "Autocomplete."
• Uncheck the box to disable inline ghost text.
• The Result: You must now manually trigger the AI compute by pressing a hotkey (like Alt + \ or Option + \) only when you genuinely want a suggestion.


3. Hard-Blocking Eager Scripts via uBlock Origin
You can use uBlock Origin (the open-source content blocker) to forcefully cut off the background tracking scripts and telemetry endpoints that handle predictive typing APIs.
• Click the uBlock Origin icon and open the Dashboard (the gears icon).
• Go to the My Filters tab.
• Add custom lines to block common real-time predictive completion endpoints. For example, to stop a site from sending predictive keystrokes to background search or suggestion APIs, you can target specific background fetch patterns:
text
||://google.com^ ||://microsoft.com^$xhr
Use code with caution.
• Click Apply Changes.



4. Creating a Manual Toggle with Developer Tools
If you want to quickly test how much background chatter a specific AI web interface is generating before you even press submit:
• Right-click the page and select Inspect to open Developer Tools.
• Go to the Network tab and select the Fetch/XHR filter.
• Start typing a sentence in the AI input box.
• If you see dozens of network requests firing rapidly with every single letter you type, that interface is actively burning predictive data center energy. You can click the "Block Request URL" option on those specific endpoints to force the web page to stop talking to the background server until you hit the actual submit button.