Saturday, February 07, 2026

Make Apes Great Again Triggers the NYT






Make Apes Great Again Truggers the NYT

When the New York Times finds it newsworthy to 'report'  on "a fake post that was designed to look as if it were from President Trump about a racist video he shared on social media spread widely online over the weekend, you know it lost control of the narrative



The 6,000 plus 'journalists' members of the Global Circular Reporting Mafia Ring led by the Atheist, Antisemitic, AntiChristian, AntiMuslim, AntiTrump NYT and NOTUS Previously funded by Samantha Power's USAID and Soros have lost control of the narrative and are now relegated to rehashing old news, writing hit pieces or  manufacturing news.


He who controls the narrative and the legacy media controls the people. 

He who controls the people can cancel the past.

Leading up to the 2024 election, the GCRMR controlled the chart of accounts via the Auto-Pen Administration and of course, controlled the narrative.

Then free speech broke out, courtesy of Elon Musk

The term 'racist' has been so overused, its shock value is less than a Zimbabwe dollar.

"Terrorists and bombs may break my bones, but insults will never hurt me" - Qur'an Surah Al-Muzzammil 73:10)



The GCRMR and  Democrats feigning righteous indignation over a 'racist post' should compare to insults hurled at President Trump.
Not counting death threats and attempted assassinations, the president has endured nonstop insults from the likes of
@RepShriThanedar, Rob Rainer and Democrats. Every word Joe Biden uttered was scripted by left-wing operatives with one goal: to demonize, slander, and weaponize against President Trump and silence conservative voices across America.

Comparing implied, explicit death threats and actual attemps against Obama, Biden and Trump shows

• Targeting: Trump has been a disproportionate target of violent rhetoric in recent years, accounting for 47% of all violent threats documented in a 2025–2026 dataset.

• Obama: Individuals were sentenced for threats made at rallies (e.g., "Kill him!") or in specific communications, such as a man who threatened to "hang" Obama in 2017.

The number of people successfully prosecuted for threats against Trump compared to Trump is inversely proportional:  more threats against Trump, less successful prosecutions





As @Grey4626 would say "Super Bowl LX is engineered to be the most vicious, deliberate insult  to America in the history of this republic, and they planned every second of it with cold, calculated malice. They picked Levi’s Stadium in the heart of woke California...ground zero for the cultural demolition crew...to stage this ritual humiliation.

Halftime? Bad Bunny. A Puerto Rican reggaeton star who will perform mostly in Spanish. First “Latino” solo headliner, first Spanish-language dominance on the biggest American stage. Not a coincidence. This is linguistic and cultural replacement in real time, broadcast to 100+ million people.

They want you to feel like a stranger in your own country.

Green Day opening? The same Billie Joe Armstrong who screamed “F America” and called Trump a Nazi on stage. They brought him back to desecrate the flag again while the crowd sings along.

Psychological warfare: normalize hatred of traditional America, make patriotism feel like the fringe position. Then the pre-kickoff circus: Coco Jones singing “Lift Every Voice and Sing”...the “Black national anthem” that conservatives correctly call divisive as hell. Charlie Puth and Brandi Carlile doing the actual anthem and “America the Beautiful,” but sandwiched between identity-politics theater so the real anthem feels like an afterthought.

Even Trump called this out...said the entertainment “sows hatred” and he’s skipping the game. But the NFL doesn’t care. They hate you. They hate red America, flyover country, the people who built this nation. This isn’t entertainment; it’s a psyop to erode national cohesion, to make you accept that “American” now means borderless, raceless, rootless global consumer sludge. They timed it perfectly: peak division, post-election bitterness, immigration wars raging. Every choice is a blade aimed at your identity. They want you angry, alienated, and eventually apathetic...so you stop fighting when the next phase of the replacement rolls in. This Super Bowl isn’t a game. It’s a declaration of war on the historic American nation. I'll be starving that beast. You couldn't pay me to watch a second of it."




Historical data indicates that the number of individuals successfully prosecuted for federal threats varies significantly across administrations, often peaking during periods of heightened national tension. Between 1986 and 2024, the federal government prosecuted a total of 1,444 cases involving threats against presidents or others in the line of successio


Prosecution Totals by President (Historical)
The number of federal prosecutions brought during specific presidential terms is as follows:
PresidentTerm(s)Number of Prosecutions
Bill Clinton1993–2001343
George W. Bush2001–2009383
Barack Obama2009–2017213
Donald Trump2017–2021 (First Term)68
Comparative Threat Landscape (2024–


Recent data shows a sharp increase in the volume of violent rhetoric, with Donald Trump identified as a disproportionate target. Targeting Disparity: In a 2024–2025 dataset, threats against Donald Trump accounted for 47% of all violent threats documented.

Surge in Rhetoric: 
Violent rhetoric targeting Republicans rose by 364% between 2022 and 2025, while threats against Democrats increased by 124% in the same period. This gap widened significantly following the July 2024 assassination attempt on Trump.

General Climate: 
Threats against members of Congress also spiked, with the U.S. Capitol Police investigating 9,474 "concerning statements or direct threats" in 2024, nearly triple the number investigated in 2017.


No comments: