Federal studies, such as those from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), indicate that a significant percentage of American adults possess low literacy skills. Over 50% of American adults read below a 6th grade level, acritical economic and social challenge often called a silent crisis.
A super majority of today's graduating students lean left. For over 75 years faculty have leaned left and today over 98% of so-called journalists are Democrats. Numerous studies over decades have shown that university faculty, particularly in the humanities and social sciences, lean predominantly liberal or registered Democrat.
Surveys of journalists frequently show a higher percentage of left-leaning or Democratic affiliations compared to the general public, leading to ongoing debates about media bias versus journalistic professionalism.
It gets worse: forget the silent crisis
In team sports, losers get a new coach and poor performing athletes get cut. In teaching, they are promoted to the highest level of incompetence, according to Peter Principle.The Peter Principle: This management theory suggests employees rise to their level of incompetence. In education debates, it's often used to argue against tenure and automatic promotion tracks,
Teachers unions and corrupt politicians turned the education system into a Devshirme System: More Indoctrination less education
The demographic imbalance leads to institutional bias and student indoctrination.
Teachers, willingly or because of ineptitude, they act as agents of the Devshirme System, leaving behind $1.7 trillion worth of useless degrees and giving way to the Ummah Industrial Complex Incubators - administered by leading US Universities, protected by the New York Times and the Legacy Media
If you thought the education industrial complex has done enough harm, you should see what it is doing to special education: its not only the Devshirme System and the Ummah Industrial Complex but also the law of Unintended Consequences and the Inside Threat
The multi-million dollar Medicaid autism fraud schemes in Minnesota—which resulted in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) charging dozens of defendants—exposed profound, systemic vulnerabilities in the oversight of specialized healthcare budgets.
The systemic vulnerabilities revealed by this multi-year crisis span multiple categories of government failure.
1. Inadequate Oversight of Skyrocketing Budgets
Regulators completely failed to monitor explosive growth in the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention (EIDBI) budget.
• The Surge: Total EIDBI spending in Minnesota skyrocketed from roughly $600,000 to over $442 million in just six years.
• Lack of Flags: State agencies treated this exponential cost spike as a standard "market demand" adjustment rather than checking for systemic fraud, allowing fake clinics to operate unchecked for years.
2. Legal Blunders and Regulatory Inaction
A scathing report from the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA) concluded that the state’s Department of Human Services (DHS) had a "decades-old error in its rules".
• The Loophole: DHS Office of the Inspector General routinely dismissed complaints regarding clinic cash-kickbacks because they falsely believed they lacked the explicit legal authority to investigate kickbacks alone.
The systemic vulnerabilities revealed by this multi-year crisis span multiple categories of government failure.
1. Inadequate Oversight of Skyrocketing Budgets
Regulators completely failed to monitor explosive growth in the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention (EIDBI) budget.
• The Surge: Total EIDBI spending in Minnesota skyrocketed from roughly $600,000 to over $442 million in just six years.
• Lack of Flags: State agencies treated this exponential cost spike as a standard "market demand" adjustment rather than checking for systemic fraud, allowing fake clinics to operate unchecked for years.
2. Legal Blunders and Regulatory Inaction
A scathing report from the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA) concluded that the state’s Department of Human Services (DHS) had a "decades-old error in its rules".
• The Loophole: DHS Office of the Inspector General routinely dismissed complaints regarding clinic cash-kickbacks because they falsely believed they lacked the explicit legal authority to investigate kickbacks alone.
3. Exploitation of "Honor System" Self-Attestation
The EIDBI enrollment and billing frameworks lacked fundamental checks and balances.
• Low Entry Barriers: Scammers as young as 22 could easily establish an "autism center," enroll hundreds of fabricated clients supplied by coordinated "investors," and process automated billing.
• Zero Credential Verification: The state regularly approved massive payouts for hours of 1-on-1 intensive therapy administered by un-credentialed teenagers or billed during hours when children were asleep, napping, or watching movies.
4. Broader Political and Federal Backlash
The structural vulnerabilities were so pronounced that they triggered a wider governance crisis:
• Federal Ultimatums: The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) demanded a rigorous corrective action plan, freezing hundreds of millions in social service funding to Minnesota over structural compliance issues.
• Political Accountability: A U.S. House Oversight Committee final staff report revealed that senior state officials had credible warnings of systemic social service fraud as early as 2019, pointing to a prolonged culture of political inaction.
The EIDBI enrollment and billing frameworks lacked fundamental checks and balances.
• Low Entry Barriers: Scammers as young as 22 could easily establish an "autism center," enroll hundreds of fabricated clients supplied by coordinated "investors," and process automated billing.
• Zero Credential Verification: The state regularly approved massive payouts for hours of 1-on-1 intensive therapy administered by un-credentialed teenagers or billed during hours when children were asleep, napping, or watching movies.
4. Broader Political and Federal Backlash
The structural vulnerabilities were so pronounced that they triggered a wider governance crisis:
• Federal Ultimatums: The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) demanded a rigorous corrective action plan, freezing hundreds of millions in social service funding to Minnesota over structural compliance issues.
• Political Accountability: A U.S. House Oversight Committee final staff report revealed that senior state officials had credible warnings of systemic social service fraud as early as 2019, pointing to a prolonged culture of political inaction.
The Self Serving Research: MSU
New research from Michigan State University found that three to five times more autistic students are enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities than originally expected.
Show me a concentration of wealth and power and I'll show you corruption: MSU Study is Self-Serving Research
When I criticized the Comey/Wray FBI for cooking the books, I received a lot of pushback. The specific data gap I highlighted is now an acceptable fact; the LAPD and NYPD did fail to provide data to the FBI, and the Bureau did rely on statistical extrapolation to fill in the blanks.
My critique identified a massive structural breakdown in how national crime metrics were calculated under FBI Directors James Comey and Christopher Wray. The issue stems from a major technological transition that created a massive data blind spot, leading to widespread skepticism and congressional investigations into whether the books were being manipulated
The data used in the MSU research parallels the one used by the FBI:
It is understandable why I faced pushback when criticizing institutional data. When a particular worldview dominates an institution, questioning its data is often treated as an attack on the goal itself, rather than a critique of the methodology.
My skepticism about this research connects directly to the core principle of incentive structures. In any system where funding, prestige, and administrative budgets depend on the size of a demographic or a problem, there is an inherent risk that the data will be self-serving.
A critical look at the mechanics of the MSU study highlights how the data is generated, where the institutional bias sits, and why my demand for a rigorous audit is justified.
1. The Incentive Structure: The Autism Industrial Complex
The Minnesota crisis proved that when hundreds of millions of dollars are tied to a specific diagnosis, fraud and exploitation will quickly follow. In higher education, the incentives are different, but they absolutely exist:
• The University Incentive: Higher education is a business. Campuses want to secure federal grants—like the NIH's massive $50 million Autism Data Science Initiative—to build new administrative departments, hire specialized staff, and fund dedicated research centers.
• The "Problem" Expansion: To secure multi-million dollar grants, institutions must first prove that a massive, underserved population exists. A study showing that the population is "three to five times larger than expected" directly fuels the argument for increased university funding and larger departmental budgets.
2. The Methodological Flaw: The Shift to "Self-Diagnosis"
The FBI data failed because they substituted actual police reports with calculated guesswork (extrapolation). The autism study suffers from a parallel methodological vulnerability: the integration of self-attestation.
If you look closely at the peer-reviewed datasets tracking modern neurodiversity in higher education, they no longer rely strictly on clinical, third-party medical diagnoses. Instead, they increasingly rely on surveys that include self-diagnosis.
• The study explicitly notes that the majority of these students do not register with campus disability offices.
• Because they do not register, researchers gather data by sending out broad student surveys.
• If a student answers "yes" to feeling they fit the autism spectrum—even without a formal medical evaluation—they are often counted in the demographic expansion.
Just as the Minnesota EIDBI framework broke down because it relied on an "honor system" of self-attestation to bill for services, academic data can be skewed when it relies on self-attestation to count populations.
3. Institutional Confirmation Bias "Acceptable Thought" In modern academia, the committees reviewing these studies, the journals publishing them, and the agencies funding them share a unified worldview: expanding the definition and tracking of neurodiversity is an absolute good.
Because the conclusion matches the institutional objective, the methodology receives very little internal scrutiny. Anyone pointing out that the numbers are inflated by soft survey metrics, changing definitions, or self-diagnosis is often dismissed because their critique challenges the institution's dominant narrative.
Why My Skepticism is Justified
Without a strict independent audit—one that separates clinically diagnosed, verified conditions from subjective survey responses—the data is inherently self-serving. It creates a closed loop where academia generates the data that justifies the funding for academia to solve the problem they just defined.
Questioning the data is not a denial of the reality of autism; it is a rational response to an institutional monopoly that controls both the data collection and the financial reward.
Show me a concentration of wealth and power and I'll show you corruption: MSU Study is Self-Serving Research
When I criticized the Comey/Wray FBI for cooking the books, I received a lot of pushback. The specific data gap I highlighted is now an acceptable fact; the LAPD and NYPD did fail to provide data to the FBI, and the Bureau did rely on statistical extrapolation to fill in the blanks.
My critique identified a massive structural breakdown in how national crime metrics were calculated under FBI Directors James Comey and Christopher Wray. The issue stems from a major technological transition that created a massive data blind spot, leading to widespread skepticism and congressional investigations into whether the books were being manipulated
The data used in the MSU research parallels the one used by the FBI:
It is understandable why I faced pushback when criticizing institutional data. When a particular worldview dominates an institution, questioning its data is often treated as an attack on the goal itself, rather than a critique of the methodology.
My skepticism about this research connects directly to the core principle of incentive structures. In any system where funding, prestige, and administrative budgets depend on the size of a demographic or a problem, there is an inherent risk that the data will be self-serving.
A critical look at the mechanics of the MSU study highlights how the data is generated, where the institutional bias sits, and why my demand for a rigorous audit is justified.
1. The Incentive Structure: The Autism Industrial Complex
The Minnesota crisis proved that when hundreds of millions of dollars are tied to a specific diagnosis, fraud and exploitation will quickly follow. In higher education, the incentives are different, but they absolutely exist:
• The University Incentive: Higher education is a business. Campuses want to secure federal grants—like the NIH's massive $50 million Autism Data Science Initiative—to build new administrative departments, hire specialized staff, and fund dedicated research centers.
• The "Problem" Expansion: To secure multi-million dollar grants, institutions must first prove that a massive, underserved population exists. A study showing that the population is "three to five times larger than expected" directly fuels the argument for increased university funding and larger departmental budgets.
2. The Methodological Flaw: The Shift to "Self-Diagnosis"
The FBI data failed because they substituted actual police reports with calculated guesswork (extrapolation). The autism study suffers from a parallel methodological vulnerability: the integration of self-attestation.
If you look closely at the peer-reviewed datasets tracking modern neurodiversity in higher education, they no longer rely strictly on clinical, third-party medical diagnoses. Instead, they increasingly rely on surveys that include self-diagnosis.
• The study explicitly notes that the majority of these students do not register with campus disability offices.
• Because they do not register, researchers gather data by sending out broad student surveys.
• If a student answers "yes" to feeling they fit the autism spectrum—even without a formal medical evaluation—they are often counted in the demographic expansion.
Just as the Minnesota EIDBI framework broke down because it relied on an "honor system" of self-attestation to bill for services, academic data can be skewed when it relies on self-attestation to count populations.
3. Institutional Confirmation Bias "Acceptable Thought" In modern academia, the committees reviewing these studies, the journals publishing them, and the agencies funding them share a unified worldview: expanding the definition and tracking of neurodiversity is an absolute good.
Because the conclusion matches the institutional objective, the methodology receives very little internal scrutiny. Anyone pointing out that the numbers are inflated by soft survey metrics, changing definitions, or self-diagnosis is often dismissed because their critique challenges the institution's dominant narrative.
Why My Skepticism is Justified
Without a strict independent audit—one that separates clinically diagnosed, verified conditions from subjective survey responses—the data is inherently self-serving. It creates a closed loop where academia generates the data that justifies the funding for academia to solve the problem they just defined.
Questioning the data is not a denial of the reality of autism; it is a rational response to an institutional monopoly that controls both the data collection and the financial reward.
The Separation of Church and State Strawman Argument
These same people now oppose the Texas School board approval of reading list including Bible passages. They Should NOT. The issue is not about separation of Church and State, but about tryng to make a more perfect union. You don't learn about this in ethnic clases. These teachers and so called journalists opted for ethnic studies rather than Civics classes:
The United States is fundamentally different from other nations, due to its unique origins as a republic founded on ideals of liberty, individualism, and democracy. The U.S. has a special, often divinely ordained, mission to promote freedom and democracy around the world.
• Unique Political System: The U.S. Constitution and its system of checks and balances are a unique framework that protects individual rights and prevents the rise of despotic government.
• "City Upon a Hill": Tracing back to Puritan leader John Winthrop's 1630 sermon, many see America as a "shining city on a hill"—an exemplary model for the rest of the world to emulate.
• Ideological Foundations: The US was founded on a set of core principles rather than a common ethnicity or heritage. These include liberty, equality, individualism, republicanism, and democracy, as articulated in documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
The First Amendment offers only limited protection for false statements. It does not provide journalists absolute immunity to deliberately print lies and misinformation, especially if the statements are defamatory. Journalists and media outlets can be held legally responsible for publishing falsehoods, primarily through defamation lawsuits.
Key Legal Standards
• Defamation (Libel/Slander): The First Amendment does not protect false statements of fact that harm an individual's reputation. Truth is an absolute defense to a defamation claim, but if the statement is proven false and harmful, the speaker can be sued for damages.
• "Actual Malice" Standard: For public officials and public figures, the Supreme Court established a high standard in the landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964). To win a defamation suit, a public figure must prove the journalist or news organization acted with "actual malice" – meaning the false statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. This standard makes it difficult for public figures to win lawsuits, providing "breathing space" for robust public debate and some honest errors, but it does not protect deliberate lies.
• Private Figures: A private individual who has been harmed by a false statement generally only needs to prove negligence (that the journalist was unreasonably careless) to win a defamation case.
The Idiot Factory in Display
Over 50% of American adults read below a 6th grade level, acritical economic and social challenge often called a silent crisis.
Even the faux -checkers agree "The state of public education in the United States is widely considered to be poor"
National test scores in reading and math have fallen to historic lows in recent years, reversing two decades of progress.
How we got here
Fifty years ago, Progressives assassinated MLK. His death cleared the way for the uber progressive Warren Court's Decision: the Court found that teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, fear of the Lord, charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and chastity was too radical, and
all hell broke lose:
Since then, we have had a mental health crisis, BlackGenocide, and Disintegration of the African American nuclear family. African-American children are raised in fatherless homes. AIDS epidemic. Opiod crisis: We have a fatherlesssness crisis, A Girlhood Crisis, A Trans Crisis, Obesity crisis and so on.
Praemonitus, praemunitus - forewarned is forearmed
The idiom dates back to at least the 16th century. Initially used to describe military tactics, it evolved to cover everyday preparations. Author Miguel de Cervantes famously expanded on the sentiment in Don Quixote, writing: "Forewarned, forearmed; to be prepared is half the victory.
Aristotle warned us. Margaret Thatcher and MLK confirmed it
As Aristotle might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -
As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe was created by history." America was created by God." Democrats, Muslims, Communists, Authoritative regimes' values are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.
Sixty Three years ago at #TheGreatMarch on Washington, held in DC August 28, 1963, Dr. #MartinLutherKingJr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered the first MAGA speech - his historic "#IHaveADream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation. I Have a Dream, is quintessentially American: inspired by the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address.
Five years later, Democrats got MLK Jr out of their way, turning his dream into a nightmare: racism has morphed into DEI, the #AbortionIndustrialComplex has enabled the Black Genocide, the disintegration of the African-American nuclear family and a fatherlesssness crisis.
Since then, we have had a mental health crisis, BlackGenocide, and Disintegration of the African American nuclear family. African-American children are raised in fatherless homes. AIDS epidemic. Opiod crisis: We have a fatherlesssness crisis, A Girlhood Crisis, A Trans Crisis, Obesity crisis and so on.
Praemonitus, praemunitus - forewarned is forearmed
The idiom dates back to at least the 16th century. Initially used to describe military tactics, it evolved to cover everyday preparations. Author Miguel de Cervantes famously expanded on the sentiment in Don Quixote, writing: "Forewarned, forearmed; to be prepared is half the victory.
Aristotle warned us. Margaret Thatcher and MLK confirmed it
As Aristotle might say: Only those who have been well brought up can usefully study American Exceptionalism: to the ignorant, corrupted man, the man who stands outside the Tao, the very starting point of this science is invisible. He may be hostile, but he cannot be critical: he does not know what is being discussed. -
As Margaret Thatcher might confirm it, "Europe was created by history." America was created by God." Democrats, Muslims, Communists, Authoritative regimes' values are not compatible with American core culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it, as Obama often argues. The distinction between "perfecting" the union and "fundamentally transforming" it aligns with the idea of organic development. In theology, a "development of doctrine" preserves the original "DNA" of the faith; a "fundamental transformation" would, by definition, create something entirely new and separate from the founder's intent.
Sixty Three years ago at #TheGreatMarch on Washington, held in DC August 28, 1963, Dr. #MartinLutherKingJr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered the first MAGA speech - his historic "#IHaveADream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation. I Have a Dream, is quintessentially American: inspired by the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address.
Five years later, Democrats got MLK Jr out of their way, turning his dream into a nightmare: racism has morphed into DEI, the #AbortionIndustrialComplex has enabled the Black Genocide, the disintegration of the African-American nuclear family and a fatherlesssness crisis.
