Tuesday, September 02, 2025

If it's not the Democrats war on Christianity, what is it? It's not differences of opinion as the Evidence Industrial Complex suggests

The Democrats war on Christianity, is not unlike what we are seeing with the so-called scientists dismissed, or resigning from the CDC.  The New York Times is reporting that "CDC staff held a “clap-out” to honor three of the agency’s high-ranking officials who resigned in protest after President Trump fired the director, Susan Monarez. "What makes us great at CDC is following the science," said Dr. Dan Jernigan, one of the three officials who resigned. "So let's get the politics out of public health. Let's get back to the objectivity and let the science lead us.


Dr. Demetre Daskalakis promotes science and objectivity - This was the Satanic Filth that was embedded at the CDC that made guidelines for your child’s ‘health’ which included Sexual Mutilation, Sterilization and forced Bill Gates ‘Vaccines’ that cause Cancer.



It's not talking point, or 
a case of difference of opinion as the  Evidence Industrial Complex suggests, it's the Democrats' War on Christianity.  


But if you ask Grok, Meta, Gemini, NYT, CNN or PBS, whether Democrats are waging a war on Christianity, a typical response is potato, potatoe - just difference of opinion, such as the the response from Google's Gemini.  "The accusation that the Democratic Party is engaged in a "war on Christianity" is a political talking point used by some conservative and Christian commentators, while others view it as a mischaracterization of the party's platform. Instead of targeting Christianity specifically, critics argue that the Democratic Party's policies and platforms conflict with certain traditional Christian beliefs and priorities. 

Key arguments made by critics
Critics cite specific actions and policy stances to support the idea that the Democratic Party is hostile toward Christians.



  • Abortion and LGBTQ+ rights: Many conservative Christians believe that life begins at conception and that marriage is exclusively between a man and a woman. Democratic support for abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights is therefore seen as a direct attack on their core religious values.


The Christian persecution  by the Obama/Biden's DOJ, FBI, CIA made it obvious. 




The recent parade of prominent politicians and TV personalities like Gavin Newsom and Jen Psaki mocking the murder of catholic children by a man dressed as a girl, leaves little. So why does the Evidence Industrial Complex suggests it's just a matter of perspective?





But this is nothing new.  The murder of Martin Luther King made that attack on Christianity self-evident

As Margaret Thatcher might say, "Europe  was created by history." America was created by God."  Democrats, Muslims, Communists, Authoritative regimes' values  are not compatible with Founding American Culture. You can work to make a more perfect union, not to fundamentally transform it.

In the words of President Abraham Lincoln "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.... The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth

In Matthew 12:30Jesus makes it clear: "If you are not for me, you are against me" to highlight that there is no neutral position when it comes to His mission and kingdom. The context suggests that anyone who is not actively participating in the work of gathering people to God's kingdom is, by their inaction, working against it.

Why is it the Evidence Industrial Complex dismisses the Democrats' War on Christianity as merely a political talking point?

President Trump just  demanded the Evidence Industrial Complex come clean on the Pfizer's COVID Vaccine:
"It is very important that the Drug Companies justify the success of their various Covid Drugs. Many people think they are a miracle that saved Millions of lives. Others disagree! With CDC being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer, and I want it NOW. I have been shown information from Pfizer, and others, that is extraordinary, but they never seem to show those results to the public. Why not??? They go off to the next "hunt" and let everyone rip themselves apart, including Bobby Kennedy Jr. and CDC, trying to figure out the success or failure of the Drug Companies Covid work. They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!! "


Pfizer's Dr Becci Corkill's used the Knowledge Doubling Curve to show the COVID Vaccine is a wonder drug. https://x.com/CotoBlogzz/status/1954709931812430139… But they fail to disclose the side effects: this is the work of the Evidence Industrial Complex aka "publication bias" in medicine. Dr. Ben Goldacre, a physician, academic, and author and other speakers explain that the results of clinical trials are often selectively reported, with studies showing positive or favorable outcomes more likely to be published than those with negative or inconclusive findings. This practice is dangerous because it distorts the body of medical evidence, leaving doctors and researchers with an incomplete and misleading picture of a drug's true effects. The same thing happens in journalism, politics and any other field. Ask Grok. It will reason like the NYT and only use 'evidence' accepted by the establishment.

In the Ted Talk "What doctors don't know about the drugs they prescribe" Ben Goldacre (TEDMED 2012) Goldacre explains that when a new drug is tested, the trials are sometimes hidden, and negative or inconclusive results go unreported. He argues this is a systematic flaw in medicine that leaves doctors and patients unable to make fully informed decisions. In "Battling bad science" by Ben Goldacre (TEDGlobal 2011) Goldacre expands on the problem of misrepresentation in medicine. He covers how evidence can be distorted by pharmaceutical companies and even by well-meaning but misguided journalists doctors - abd AI platforms like Grok? Look at the LGTBQ+ affinity group versus violence. The established body of evidence paints the group as a victim. x.com/CotoBlogzz/sta x.com/CotoBlogzz/sta • Financial motivation: Pharmaceutical companies have a clear financial incentive to suppress negative clinical trial data. Goldacre details how companies have historically withheld or manipulated data to make their drugs look more effective and safer than they are.


Academic pressure: The academic culture of "publish or perish" pressures researchers to produce "positive" results. Studies with impressive, statistically significant findings are more likely to be accepted by prestigious journals, which boosts a scientist's career. Negative or inconclusive results are often left unpublished in a file drawer. • Misleading the medical community: Because only a biased sample of all trial data is published, doctors and researchers are unaware of the full scope of a drug's performance. Goldacre offers a personal story of prescribing an antidepressant based on published evidence, only to later discover the unpublished negative trials that contradicted the positive findings.
• A broken regulatory system: The regulatory system has often failed to enforce the publication of all trial data. Goldacre notes that even after registers for clinical trials were created, many trials still went unregistered or were not published in full.


Potential solutions 
While the problem is complex, Goldacre and others propose solutions that aim to increase transparency: 
• Mandatory publication: The simplest solution is to legally require that all trials conducted on humans be published, regardless of the outcome. • Open data: Forcing the release of all data, including older trials, would give doctors and researchers a complete picture of a drug's history.

• Shift in incentives: The academic and medical publishing community must reward high-quality research, not just statistically positive results.

War on Christianity Or Political Talking Point

Likewise, the solution to determine whether the Democrats' War on Christianiy is a misnomer and its really a political talking point, is a review of all the available data.  The starting point could be the first MAGA speech delivered sixty two years ago by Dr. Martin Luther King: At  The Great March on Washington, held in DC August 28, 1963,  Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivered the first MAGA speech-  his historic "I Have A Dream" speech in which he called for an end to racism and racial segregation.   I Have a Dream, is quintessentially American: inspired by the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address.


Five years later, progressives got MLK Jr out of their way, turning his dream into a nightmare: racism has morphed into DEI, the  Abortion Industrial Complex, promoting the Abolition of the Black Man -
has enabled the Black Genocide, the disintegration of the African-American nuclear family and  a fatherlesssness crisis. 

A new Documentary exposes how the FBI tried to destroy MLK with wiretaps and blackmail - ultimately he was assassinated.   His family believes James Earl Ray was framed

MLK Jr. death cleared the way for the uber progressive Warren Court's Decision: the Court found that teaching children about wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety,  fear of the Lord., charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, modesty, self-control and  chastity was too radical, all hell broke lose.


Using analysis tools like the Ishikawa Cause-Effect Diagram, the Pareto Rule, Security Professionals' Attack Tree and or Occam's Razor, they all suggest that after the uber progressive  Warren SCOTUS  (1963) decision, we have had

No comments: