By Chriss Streete
It is amusing that the United States, as the world’s number one arms smuggler to friendly places like Libya and Syria, would lead the effort to pass the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (“ATT”) regulating and controlling the export of weaponry.
Advocates contend ATT regulate the sale of assault weapons, such as tanks, combat vehicles, aircraft, attack helicopters and ammunition for such weapons to dangerous rogue countries who may pose a terrorist threat. But ATT only prohibits export of weapons to nation-states; it does not prohibit export to terrorists. What ATT does do is internationally define regulated weapons to include small arms and the ammunition for “such weapons”. ATT compliance will require national gun micro-stamping and registry. |
The United Nations General Assembly adopted ATT as “Agenda
Item 94: General and Complete Disarmament” by a vote of 154 to 3 with 23
abstentions. In the words of the General Assembly President, John William
Ashe of Antigua and Barbuda “The historic dimension of this day” is that a
global arms trade treaty is “for the first time the subject of action in this
Chamber.” Last July, the United States blocked an agreement because
negotiators wanted a stronger agreement. The General Assembly President
noted the Conference on Disarmament had not produced significant “results in
over a decade.
Syria was one of the three votes against ATT. They
pointed out that the treaty only regulated state to state sales and
conveniently failed to “categorically ban” supplying weapons to “non-state
terrorists” that fail to seek U.N. approval for their mayhem. These are
diplomatic code words for why are the U.S, Qatar and Saudi Arabia not
prohibited from smuggling weapons to the supposed Free Syrian Army.
Indonesia abstained from voting for ATT, because the treaty
text contained “substantive deficiencies”, such as not allowing nations to
import weapons for self-defense against armed non-state actors.
Cuba stated: “This is a document that is not balanced”, since failing to
prohibit weapons transfers to unauthorized non-state actors is a flagrant
violation of the principles of the United Nations. These are more code words
for, we are also afraid of the CIA arming rebels and terrorists.
Nicaragua stated that they were abstaining, because
they similarly opposed transfers to unauthorized non-state actors and regretted
that the right to self-defense was not recognized. Their Ambassador noted that
unlawful weapons transfers in the 1980s resulted in many thousands of
Nicaraguans being killed. These are code words for, the United States CIA
and Russian KGB armed rebels and counter-rebels slaughtered us.
What ATT really does is supplant the United Nations
Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small
Arms (“PoA”) passed in 2001 by adding ammunition for small arms as a regulated
item for the first time. Although the PoA covered a broad range of
controls on export sales, ATT expands the control to include domestic transit,
brokering and technology transfer. These legally binding national-level
commitments include establishment of laws, regulations, and administrative
procedures governing weapons and ammunition transfers within a nation’s
borders. ATT mandates a 10 year registry of ownership of covered
weapons, which appears to be any weapon.
To comply with this record keeping would require
micro-stamping, which involves the use of laser technology to engrave a
microscopic marking onto every gun’s firing pin and breech face. When a
gun is fired the etchings will uniquely mark the shell cartridge when a bullet
is fired, creating a forensic ballistics signature on the shell casing.
California passed AB 1471 in
2007 that would have made micro-stamping mandatory for all weapons by 2010
based on claims the technology would enable law enforcement to match fired
cartridge cases from a crime scene and track illegal gun sales. The
technology vendor claimed the cost per gun to comply with the legislation would
only be between $0.50 and $8.50 per gun, depending on manufactured volume, and
would be highly reliable long-term since firing pins are “nearly as hard as a
diamond”.
But uproar from gun owners forced a suspension of the
law. Critics pointed out that criminals could steal guns and collect
discarded brass from firing ranges, then “salt” crime scenes with someone
else’s micro-stamped shell cases to create themselves an alibi and provide
false evidence against innocent people.
Although guns manufactured before the law would
grandfathered as legal to own, failure to micro-stamp parts would make of a
firearm “unsafe” under the California law and illegal to sell, give or lend
under existing law. Furthermore, it was discovered that the sole-source
technology vendor had not subjected micro-stamping to independent testing and
micro-stamped marks were substantially less reliable than advertised.
The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty will not stop many
terrorists, since terrorists are usually not nations. Most governments
around the world want to disarm their population to maintain their coercive
control. As I pointed out two weeks ago in Cypriot Bailout Without Second
Amendment, it is much easier for countries to rob their citizens
when they are disarmed.
CHRISS STREET & PAUL PRESTON
Present
“The American Exceptionalism Radio Talk Show”
Streaming Live Monday through Friday at 7-10 PM
Follow Blogs: www.chrissstreetandcompany.com & www.agenda21radio.com
Click here to listen: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/american-eceptionalism-news
Present
“The American Exceptionalism Radio Talk Show”
Streaming Live Monday through Friday at 7-10 PM
Follow Blogs: www.chrissstreetandcompany.com & www.agenda21radio.com
Click here to listen: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/american-eceptionalism-news
No comments:
Post a Comment