Prominent Muslim women, like Ilhan Omar, reject the label of "oppression" and Believe Assimilation Is a Nazi Value, despite Female Genital Mutilation, Pedophilia (child marriage,) polygamy, inheritance laws, and so on.
Sacred Scripture makes it clear: Jesus warns that if someone harms or leads a child astray, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea. Jesus' warning regarding "little ones" appears in the three Synoptic Gospels: Matthew 18:6, Mark 9:42, and Luke 17:2.
Hindu sees the human person as a soul trapped in a body
The Buddhist sees the person as neither a body nor a soul
The atheist views the person as a body without a soul.
Islam's view is that humans are composite beings of physical bodies and spiritual souls. Many Muslim scholars reject a literal "image and likeness" because of the strict doctrine of Tawhid (the oneness and uniqueness of God). Since "there is nothing like unto Him" (Qur'an 42:11), any suggestion that humans physically or essentially resemble God can be seen as blasphemous anthropomorphism
The Christian view is that humans are bodies and souls, created in the image and likeness of God.
In Christianity, the person is grafted as a child of God, must deny himself, follow Jesus' teachings and the greatest joy is a to see the face of God in a one Dimensional eternity.
In Christianity path is to store treasures in heaven to get a perfect new body in a one Dimensional eternity
Every human being has a unique and rational soul that animates his human body, whether in the womb or a jail cell
Everyone made in God's image
Everyone is broken
Everyone is created for love
Everyone has desires that are not good. We are all broke
Those who identify as gay or trans, have digni
Those who experience same-sex attraction are worthwhile
Those who are grappling with their Sexuality as part of the family, that is, part of the human family, and if they are Christian, they are part of the family of God
If you are same-sex attracted person, you belong to the Catholic Church.
Occam's Razor
Applying Occam’s Razor—the principle that the simplest explanation with the fewest assumptions is most likely—to why prominent Muslim women reject the label of "oppression" yields several key insights based on their own stated perspectives:
Distinction Between Religion and Culture: For many, the simplest explanation is that Islam and local patriarchal customs are distinct entities. They view the "oppression" observed by outsiders as a product of entrenched cultural traditions or political agendas that predate or misuse the religion, rather than the faith itself.
Empowerment through Choice: Many women describe religious practices, such as wearing the hijab, as a personal choice and a form of empowerment or identity rather than a tool of subjugation. From their perspective, it is a rejection of Western standards of objectification and a way to derive dignity from their faith.Prominent voices often point to the fact that Islam granted women rights—such as property ownership, inheritance, and the right to initiate divorce—centuries before similar rights were established in many Western legal systems.
Surveys, such as those by The Gallup Organization, show that a strong majority of Muslim women believe they should have the right to vote, work outside the home, and serve in government, while simultaneously valuing their moral and spiritual traditions. They do not see these rights as being in conflict with their religion.
Many women find the Western "obsession" with their "liberation" to be dehumanizing and dismissive of their agency. They often argue that real issues—like economic instability or political repression—are ignored in favor of focusing solely on religious symbols.
In summary, the "simplest" explanation from this viewpoint is that the religion provides a framework for equality and dignity, while external "oppression" is an aberration caused by human misinterpretation and local power structures.
Confirmation Bias
People see what they want to see despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary driven primarily driven by confirmation bias, an automatic mental shortcut where your brain prioritizes information that supports your existing views while ignoring everything .
Why the Brain Rejects Evidence
• Energy Efficiency:
Evaluating new, contradictory evidence takes significant mental effort. To save energy, your brain defaults to established "neural pathways," preferring the path of least resistance.
• Emotional Protection:
Encountering evidence that proves you wrong creates cognitive dissonance—a state of mental discomfort. To avoid this "pain," your brain may suppress activity in areas associated with neutral reasoning and instead activate emotional centers to "justify" your current stance.
• Motivated Reasoning:
This is the active process of using logic to reach a desired conclusion rather than the most accurate one. You might demand a "high standard of evidence" for things you don't like while accepting flimsy support for things you do.
• Survival Instincts:
Evolutionarily, it was safer to quickly recognize patterns (like a predator in the brush) than to wait for perfect evidence. This "pattern recognizer" can lead you to "see" what you expect, such as ghosts or specific faces in ambiguous shapes (pareidolia).
Common Biases Involved
• Selective Interpretation:
Two people can see the exact same data and come to opposite conclusions based on their preexisting beliefs
• Selective Recall:
• The Backfire Effect:
To counter this, experts recommend practicing intellectual humility—acknowledging your beliefs could be wrong—and intentionally seeking out well-reasoned opposing viewpoints.






No comments:
Post a Comment