Our mission is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the status quo. Independent journalism with a focus on politics and satire, public safety, judicial misconduct, government corruption, HOA/CID, senior advocacy, sanctity of life & marriage and a voice to the voiceless
Pages
- Home
- QTRAX Classic
- Parasites
- Elder Abuse
- TCBJ Data Mining Tools
- Prison Reform- Mental Health
- Suggested Christian Businesses
- Public Safety
- Letters to the Editor
- For the Birds
- Public Education
- Judicial Misconduct Tracker
- HOA Legal Resources
- Other HOA Sites
- Advertise
- HOA Advocate D. Vanitzian
- The American Divide
- CDN
Thursday, May 06, 2010
Laguna Woods' Rosenfeld Guilty of Murdering 82-Year-old Mother
Posted By CotoBlogzz 05-05-2010
SANTA ANA , CA - than Emanuel Rosenfeld was convicted today of strangling and murdering his 82-year-old mother, with whom he was living in her Leisure World home. Ethan Emanuel Rosenfeld, 52, Laguna Woods, was found guilty by a jury of one felony count of first degree murder. As the defendant entered pleas of "not guilty" and "not guilty by reason of insanity," Rosenfeld now faces the sanity phase of his trial . Opening statements in the sanity phase are scheduled to begin May 11, 2010.
Between 4:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on May 30, 2005, Rosenfeld strangled and murdered his 82-year-old widowed mother, Helen. He put her dead body in her bed, crossed her arms across her chest, and wrapped her body in a sheet. The defendant, who was unemployed and living with his mother in her Leisure World home in Laguna Woods, then fled taking the victim's credit card and car.
Rosenfeld went to Starbucks and a gas station and tried to use his murdered mother's credit card to buy coffee and chewing tobacco. He drove around for a while before returning to the house. At approximately 10:00 a.m., Rosenfeld called 911 and claimed that he found his mother dead and that she had passed away in her sleep.
As Rosenfeld entered pleas of "not guilty" and "not guilty by reason of insanity," the trial will be held in two phases. In the guilt phase, during which the court heard evidence about the crime, the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury that the defendant is guilty of the charged crime. In the sanity phase, the same jury will consider evidence to determine if the defendant was legally sane at the time of the crime. When a defendant pleads "not guilty by reason of insanity," the burden is on the defense to prove that the defendant was more likely than not legally insane when he committed the crime. To be considered legally insane, the defense must prove that the defendant had a mental disease or defect when he committed the crime and that this defect kept the defendant from understanding the nature of his act or from understanding that his act was morally or legally wrong.
Senior Deputy District Attorney Ebrahim Baytieh of the Homicide Unit is prosecuting this case.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment