The Honorable Jorge A. Solis to rule on the case Taitz v Sebelius 3-12-cv-3251 and on a motion to stay for preliminary injunction of ObamaTax brought by California attorney Orly Taitz.
.
Posted By
CotoBlogzz
Rancho Santa
Margarita, CA – The Honorable Jorge A. Solis, H.W. Bush appointee in Northern
District of Texas is to rule on the case Taitz v Sebelius 3-12-cv-3251 and on a motion to stay for preliminary injunction of ObamaTax brought by
California attorney Orly Taitz.
While the
case originated in the Central District of California, it was was transferred
to the Northern District of Texas, when initially appointed judge, Honorable
Dolly Gee ruled No Venue in CA.
From the cotton fields in Abilene to next in line as
Chief Judge for the Northern District of Texas, Judge Jorge Solis has a story
any parent would be proud to tell. Despite having only an eighth grade
education herself, Judge Solis’s mother encouraged her son by explaining that
he could either pick cotton the rest of his life or get an education.
Judge Solis was one of seven children. Because of his
parents’ emphasis on education, all seven of their children went to college and
five of the seven obtained college degrees. Judge Solis was the only one of the
seven to obtain a graduate degree.
.
After graduating high school, he attended McMurry
University, where he earned a degree in history in 1973. Then his dream of
attending UT became a reality when he was accepted into law school.. His first trial was the prosecution of a traffic ticket
in JP court in Abilene. For many years after the trial, the opposing lawyer
on the case teased Judge Solis about how he “tried the case like he was in
front of the Supreme Court.”
Judge Solis was
elected the Criminal District Attorney in 1983 and reelected in 1986. Then,
in 1987, at the suggestion of Bill Thomas, the retiring Judge, Judge Solis
ran for the 350th Judicial District in Abilene. In the interim, he worked as
a solo practitioner in Abilene in 1988. In 1988, Judge Solis was elected to the bench and
served on the 350th Judicial District Court from 1989 to 1991
|
|
Judge Solis, like many other first time judges, was
surprised by the difference in the mindset required of a good judge. Although
Judge Solis had experience as an advocate on both sides of the criminal and
civil dockets, he had to repeatedly remind himself during his first year that
he needed to “let the lawyers be the advocates.”
Although he thought his chances were “slim to none,” he
decided to apply for an opening on the federal bench in Dallas. Upon the
recommendation of Senator Gramm, President George H.W. Bush nominated Judge
Solis in 1991.
Even though he is a federal judge with the inherent power
that the position brings, Judge Solis often reminds his staff: “We should stay
humble.” He likes to tell the story of one of his first cases on the federal
bench. He had sent a number of notes back to the jury signing only his name.
Eventually, a question came back from the jury, “Who is this sending these
notes back to us?”
After each trial, Judge Solis asks the jury to comment on
their experience. The number one complaint he receives from juries is redundancy.
The number two complaint is that lawyers are not professional, which is a pet
peeve of his. While lawyers must be zealous advocates of the client’s case, a
good advocate should not resort to gamesmanship and unprofessional conduct
directed at the opposing lawyers.
Judge Solis lives in Dallas with his wife and is active
in the St. Elizabeth of Hungary church. He has three children, the oldest of
whom is a lawyer in Boston. He serves as the liaison from the federal judiciary
to the State Bar of Texas. He is also involved in the Criminal Law Committee of
the State Bar of Texas, which has been compiling a series of books with pattern
jury charges for criminal cases.
Taitz brought
forward 2 main arguments:
1. In
2800 pages of ObamaCare, Obama administration buried a provision, where one can
be completely exempt from paying even a cent in Health Care penalty/tax, if
buying insurance is against his religious believes. Such aversion to insurance
can be found in Muslim religion, where insurance is considered a form of
gambling. That means that individuals, who are Christians and Jews would have
to carry on their backs the burden of ObamaTax, while Muslims will be exempt. Taitz argued that such religious
discrimination is
flagrantly unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause, Freedom of Religion
Clause and
Equal Protection clause.
Equal Protection clause.
2. Additionally
Taitz argued that ObamaTax is unconstitutional, as it was signed into law by
Obama, who is a foreign national, a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a
citizen of Kenya and Great Britain, who got into the White House by virtue of
fraud and use of forged identification papers and a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425.
Taitz attached over a hundred pages of sworn affidavits and other evidence
confirming fraud and forgery in Obama’s IDs
The
case should be entered on PACER by the end of the day Monday August 27, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment