By George K. Staropoli
A class action suit
was filed in Maricopa County, AZ against numerous HOA management firms for the
unauthorized practice of law resulting from their attempts to collect HOA
debts. The two plaintiffs allege against some 30 management firms, among
other things,
Upon information and
belief, the Defendants represented to the public and to members of the Class
that they were acting with the full measure of authority reserved for licensed
legal counsel for Defendants by negotiating debt on behalf of a third party,
drafting, filing and/or preparing legal papers, including liens, debt
collection letters, complaints, default judgment, judgments, and other debt
collections activities which require the appearance of a licensed and
authorized attorney; and charging fees for the foregoing activities. . . .
Defendants actions directed at these Class Members constitute the unauthorized
practice of law and are clear violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices
Act and Arizona law.
Crame
v. 360 Management (Maricopa County Superior Court, CV
2012-095288, Sept. 10, 2012). The case has been moved to Federal Court.
A class action is
undertaken when the number of victims is so numerous and who have basically the
same allegations of wrongdoing. The two plaintiffs represent the class of
homeowners who meet the following criteria,
All persons or
entities who, at any time from August 1, 2006 to the present (the “Class
Period”), were members of a Homeowners’ Association or like entity and who were
pursued for an alleged debt owed to that Homeowners’ Association or like entity
by any of the Defendants or other Community Management Companies who purported
to pursue collections against said persons or entities without proper legal
representation and/or on behalf of their third party HOA/Condo customers
and/or who improperly held themselves out to be an attorney.
Related
information
No comments:
Post a Comment