Posted By CotoBlogzz
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA – at a
time when California is in survival mode with investors,
like Warren Buffett, dumping California's municipal bonds after California
sales tax revenue nose-dived by 33.5%, and as Chriss Street
might say, “The state is going to pound the California cities and
counties for every penny it can get.” At it only gets worse. On
July 10, 2012, San Bernardino became the third California city in less
than two weeks to file municipal bankruptcy protection, with Stockton and
Mammoth Lakes preceding it, when the city council voted opted for bankruptcy
protection in the face of a $45-million budget shortfall. Stockton’s shortfall at the time of filing
was $26 million budget shortfall.
And Mammoth Lakes sought
bankruptcy protection from a $43 million court judgment.
So, when Standard & Poor’s Primary
Credit Analyst, DanielJ.
Zuccarello, says that the City of Rancho Santa Margarita’s Certificates
of Participation (COP) as AA+ rating reflects
“maintenance of very strong available General Fund reserves, supported by good financial management policies and practices,’ and that "the stable outlook reflects Standard & Poor's opinion of the City's willingness to make the budget adjustments necessary to maintain stable operations, supported by very strong General Fund reserves that exceed 103% of operating expenditures,”
as Vice President Joe Biden might say, It is a Big
Deal!
Kudos to the City for a
strong position in an otherwise bleak environment!
We wanted to see if the Rancho's City Council’s actions could be documented and patented – that is, we wanted to
know if the law of attributions would hold true in this case, so we asked the City if it could point to specific policies it has
implemented that might have resulted in S&P’s AA+ rating affirmation and go
the following response, particularly going forward as nearly one in three homes
in the city is under water.
Possible reasons for the City's COP AA+ rating according to RSM's spokesperson Molly McLaughlin:
1) The City Council adopted pension reform
2) The
Council’s creation of a comprehensive Reserves Policy with cornerstones in:
Sustainability, Accountability and Transparency - the latter, a key piece of open-meeting budget workshop
deliberations each year
3) Maintained
conservative economic assumptions during the budget workshops to ensure fiscal
sustainability;
4) Encouraged
staff to pursue one-time revenues including CFD reimbursement and Edison energy credits;
5) Maintained
current staffing and salary levels; and
6) Recruited
a city manager and negotiated a “no-frills” contract.
Now, given the economic conditions in the area, where 35% of all homes in Ranch Santa Margarita,
we wanted to know why since the City Council has been receiving benefits including, full Medical, Dental, Vision, and Retirement, along with a stipend and additional pay for sitting on county boards while working part time, it has not reformed – or as RSM City Council candidate Hrabick says “ I believe the council should be willing to serve for their monthly stipend of $463.50. Our planning commissioners serve gladly and earn only $75.00 per meeting.
Now there seems to be a pattern between the City Council members advocating pension reform and terms limits, or as we refer to the Old Vs. The New:
The Old: Against City Pension Reform for council members, against term limits.
|
The New - for Pension Reform for council members, for term limits
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Whatever your views on pension reform and terms limits, you cannot argue with success, and while credit rating agencies do not have a stellar reputation, this is a Big Deal!
|
|||||
RELATED STORIES
http://cotobuzz.blogspot.com/2012/08/california-burning-state-controller.html
California State Controller John Chiang announced that the cities of Milpitas and Morgan Hill illegally tried to convert hundreds of millions of dollars of real estate, cash and investments that were required to be turned over to the State of California after Governor Jerry Brown and the State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 1x 26, terminating all municipal
redevelopment agencies to help cover a $25 billion budget shortfall. Before the Controller’s audits, the state had collected less than $400 million of the $3 billion they expected from the state’s 400 community redevelopment agencies. The State Controller’s charges against two small towns are a home run for the state, but are a financial nightmare that will pound cities and counties across the state.
http://cotobuzz.blogspot.com/2012/07/socal-underwater-dont-blame-rain.html
Coto de Caza, CA – One in four homeowners in Coto de Caza/Dove Canyon owe more on their loans than their homes are worth, according to a new analysis from real estate tracking firm Zillow
When homeowners walk away from their loans or pursue a short sale, something common in Coto de Caza/Dove Canyon, they push home prices lower, feeding a cycle that has hampered the Southern California real estate market for years.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment